Originally Posted by andgar923
I re- read it and while they make some logical explanations, it doesn't fully debunk the vid. It also doesn't address some key claims made in the vid. It gives half assed excuses for others that are just as much of a reach like the ones theorists make.
I think the article will only raise more questions. I can already see theorists focusing their attention on making their claims even stronger.
Instead of speaking in generalizations why don't you address the points you find half "assed"?
I think you'll find if you look into things deeper you'll find half assed conspiracy theories get half assed responses.
Most of those claims made by conspiracists surrounding Newtown are so far off based that there's really no way to respond to them other than with a quick dismissal