View Single Post
Old 01-26-2013, 06:25 PM   #19
fpliii
sick of agendas...
 
fpliii's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: nbastats.net
Posts: 9,823
fpliii is considered a brilliant InsideHoops posterfpliii is considered a brilliant InsideHoops posterfpliii is considered a brilliant InsideHoops posterfpliii is considered a brilliant InsideHoops posterfpliii is considered a brilliant InsideHoops posterfpliii is considered a brilliant InsideHoops posterfpliii is considered a brilliant InsideHoops posterfpliii is considered a brilliant InsideHoops posterfpliii is considered a brilliant InsideHoops posterfpliii is considered a brilliant InsideHoops posterfpliii is considered a brilliant InsideHoops poster
Default Re: Basketball Reference finally updated the NBA Finals Stats Boxscores from 1950 to 2012

Quote:
Originally Posted by Deuce Bigalow
Let's just forget the battles in the Western Conference?

2000 Playoffs - First 3 Rounds
Kobe - 22.8 PPG, 4.4 RPG, 4.4 APG, .464 FG%
Shaq - 28.2 PPG, 15.0 RPG, 3.4 APG, .546 FG%

2001 Playoffs - First 3 Rounds
Kobe - 31.6 PPG, 7.0 RPG, 6.3 APG, .492 FG%
Shaq - 29.3 PPG, 15.3 RPG, 2.5 APG, .547 FG%

2002 Playoffs - First 3 Rounds
Kobe - 26.6 PPG, 5.8 RPG, 4.4 APG, .418 FG%
Shaq - 26.4 PPG, 12.7 RPG, 2.6 APG, .510 FG%

Shaq carried LA to the championship in 00, I'll give you that.

In general, I think the ECF/WCF are severely undervalued. When looking at players' careers, their performances in the last two rounds of the playoffs stand out significantly to me. I think bad matchups can give you trouble occasionally, but more often than not we're gonna see the best four teams making the NBA's final four.
fpliii is offline   Reply With Quote