Originally Posted by LJJ
No shit sherlock. Of course the winner isn't going to complain, I don't see the relevance of that at all.
Look at this shit:
If can look at that picture and really believe there was no valid reason to postpone the match fandom is getting the better of you.
Should the game have been postponed? Sure.
But did it give the United States any sort of an unfair advantage? Hell no it didn't. It isn't like Zusi, OGo, Guzan, Clint, etc. play in those conditions daily.
As already said, the match should have been postponed at halftime, at the latest. Not after the game is over and Costa Rica didn't get a favorable result. Had the game ended in a draw or with the US on the losing side, I'd say the same exact thing if Klinnsman didn't try to get it postponed at the half.