Originally Posted by Carbine
QB rating is just a tool - it's flawed, much like every stat.
Andrew Luck had a 76.5 QB Rating, which would lead everyone to believe he didn't have a very effective year at all - but anyone who knows a lick about football and watched the Colts play a lot knows he dramatically out-performed that 76.5 rating.
"dramatically"?..how is that because the team won some games?
^^^ Luck led the NFL in adjusted INTs...had more passes bounce off defender's chest than any other QB
I would say his rating is pretty spot on with his performance