Originally Posted by Real Men Wear Green
A broker saying that he paid Manziel is evidence.
And again we are just seeing how ridiculous the NCAA is. They said Newton's father was paid but not Newton. Let's be real here, they just didn't want to wreck the National Championship game. Just like having Pryor's suspension begin the next season so he could play in the bowl.
A broker saying something doesn't matter. There has to be DIRECT proof for the NCAA to do anything. Not circumstantial evidence. The standard is above beyond a reasonable doubt.
"The video does not show Manziel accepting any money."
And I read that same article somewhere else and just said, "sources." USAToday I believe.
If the broker won't cooperate with the NCAA, they have nothing. The broker can say sh
it all he wants but unless there's a video of the cash payment or a sum of money deposited in Manziel's account, they gots nothing.