View Single Post
Old 08-18-2013, 06:31 PM   #35
Balla_Status
______________________
 
Balla_Status's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 4,802
Balla_Status is a pretty well-respected posterBalla_Status is a pretty well-respected posterBalla_Status is a pretty well-respected posterBalla_Status is a pretty well-respected poster
Default Re: 2013 College Football Discussion Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by Real Men Wear Green
"Read up."
A broker saying that he paid Manziel is evidence.


And again we are just seeing how ridiculous the NCAA is. They said Newton's father was paid but not Newton. Let's be real here, they just didn't want to wreck the National Championship game. Just like having Pryor's suspension begin the next season so he could play in the bowl.

A broker saying something doesn't matter. There has to be DIRECT proof for the NCAA to do anything. Not circumstantial evidence. The standard is above beyond a reasonable doubt.

"The video does not show Manziel accepting any money."

And I read that same article somewhere else and just said, "sources." USAToday I believe.

If the broker won't cooperate with the NCAA, they have nothing. The broker can say shit all he wants but unless there's a video of the cash payment or a sum of money deposited in Manziel's account, they gots nothing.
Balla_Status is offline   Reply With Quote