But what happens after that? People forget when talking about winning championship because they didn't win.
Duncan could NOT beat an elite team ONCE to his 3 championships...he got smoked by LA every year in those dynasty years.
Hakeem had to face Boston, Show-Time Lakers, Bulls, Utah, Seattle...you know REAL competition, your arrogant ass is like a router, keeps telling us the same sh*t over and over again.
Smush Parker was the MAN on the streets, he was a legend on street courts, he beat everyone on there...does that make him better then someone like Tony Parker?
Point is, Hakeem played in a tougher era...won 2 titles, put up similar numbers...he might not have AS many accomplishments as Duncan but at least the ones he has were very TOUGH to achieve, unlike Duncan. I'd rather fight a pitbull and get some licks...then fight a pug and get more licks.
Hakeem > Duncan, if you actually watched Hakeem play back in the day, you'd know why Hakeem is better.