Originally Posted by bagelred
Geez, when did simply the owning of a gun become the worst crime imaginable? Isn't USING a gun the crime?
Yet, if he lived in the country and had guns for hunting, it would be perfectly fine. Or if he simply had a license, then its all good.
Calm down, everyone. No one got hurt. Everything's ok. Take it easy on the guy......
"Throw the book at him...."
Uh huh. So let me guess...he could not afford the license to carry the gun legally, right?
Poor Gil, he needed to guns for protection but doesn't make the money to own them legally. I guess that is what happens when you "leave money on the table" when signing a contract.