Page 3 of 7 FirstFirst 123456 ... LastLast
Results 31 to 45 of 96
  1. #31
    NBA rookie of the year Kurosawa0's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    6,341

    Default Re: 1998 Chicago Bulls vs. 1999 San Antonio Spurs

    Quote Originally Posted by SwooshReturns
    But Jordan doesn't choke like that ... .
    And yet in 1991, Jordan did miss a potential game winner in the Finals. It happens.

    And here's the thing, the 1999 Spurs was better team than the Jazz.

  2. #32
    NBA rookie of the year Kurosawa0's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    6,341

    Default Re: 1998 Chicago Bulls vs. 1999 San Antonio Spurs

    Quote Originally Posted by SwooshReturns
    Oh really?



    I will see you in class then ...
    Yes, because a typo is the same as not being able to count to three.

  3. #33
    Death Before Dishonor Bigsmoke's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    CHICAGO
    Posts
    17,647

    Default Re: 1998 Chicago Bulls vs. 1999 San Antonio Spurs

    Quote Originally Posted by Lebron23
    1998 Chicago Bulls swept the 1998 San Antonio Spurs in the Regular Season without Scottie Pippen in the 2nd game, and without 7'2" Luc Longley in the first game. The 1999 Spurs were a much better team, but Jordan was undefeated in the NBA Finals. Chicago Bulls in 6 games.

    http://www.basketball-reference.com/...803140SAS.html

    http://www.basketball-reference.com/...711030CHI.html
    winning 4 titles in the row isnt going to be easy.

    not saying the Spurs would just run laps around the Bulls but i think MJ and Pippen might have some tired legs. Not to mention that MJ would be 36

  4. #34
    NBA Legend kuniva_dAMiGhTy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    16,631

    Default Re: 1998 Chicago Bulls vs. 1999 San Antonio Spurs

    '98 Bulls in 5-6. '98 Utah, imho, was better or equal to the '99 Spurs.

    Quote Originally Posted by Kurosawa0
    Yes, because a typo is the same as not being able to count to three.
    Wow, some of you people are really petty. Who gives a sh*t?
    Last edited by kuniva_dAMiGhTy; 03-20-2012 at 12:21 PM.

  5. #35
    Bulls rodman91's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    3,970

    Default Re: 1998 Chicago Bulls vs. 1999 San Antonio Spurs

    David Robinson vs Dennis Rodman.. polar opposites


    Last edited by rodman91; 03-20-2012 at 12:25 PM.

  6. #36
    Samurai Swoosh SwooshReturns's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    958

    Default Re: 1998 Chicago Bulls vs. 1999 San Antonio Spurs

    Quote Originally Posted by Kurosawa0
    And yet in 1991, Jordan did miss a potential game winner in the Finals. It happens.
    Rarely ... he came through more often than not ...

    He hit a buzzer beater tying shot in that same series

    Hit a game winning buzzer beater in the '93 Finals

    Hit a game winning buzzer beater in '97 Finals

    Assisted on a game winner in the '97 Finals

    Hit a game winning 3 in the '97 Finals (Flu Game)

    Hit a game winning shot in the '98 Finals

    More often than not ... MJ comes through when you need him to most. That's why he's the best ever.

    Quote Originally Posted by Kurosawa0
    And here's the thing, the 1999 Spurs was better team than the Jazz.
    Honestly think it was marginal at best. Even if they give the Bulls a better series, I don't think they're winning against the '98 Bulls. Which is my opinion on the series.

  7. #37
    Samurai Swoosh SwooshReturns's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    958

    Default Re: 1998 Chicago Bulls vs. 1999 San Antonio Spurs

    Quote Originally Posted by Kurosawa0
    Yes, because a typo is the same as not being able to count to three.
    This guy ...

    Two "ifs" in sports is too many and too hypothetical for me.

    Deal with it, son.

  8. #38
    Death Before Dishonor Bigsmoke's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    CHICAGO
    Posts
    17,647

    Default Re: 1998 Chicago Bulls vs. 1999 San Antonio Spurs

    good morning Swoosh

    beautiful day we are having today once again

  9. #39
    NBA rookie of the year Kurosawa0's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    6,341

    Default Re: 1998 Chicago Bulls vs. 1999 San Antonio Spurs

    Duncan and Robinson were still both double-double caliber bigs in 1999. The Bulls had a woeful front line. They had a mediocre center and undersized power forwards.

    It would be possible that Duncan could be the best player in the series.

  10. #40
    Samurai Swoosh SwooshReturns's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    958

    Default Re: 1998 Chicago Bulls vs. 1999 San Antonio Spurs

    Quote Originally Posted by Bigsmoke
    good morning Swoosh

    beautiful day we are having today once again
    I know man ... it's been like a week straight and I don't want to jinx things, but it's been feeling like straight early June in the Chi.


  11. #41
    Samurai Swoosh SwooshReturns's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    958

    Default Re: 1998 Chicago Bulls vs. 1999 San Antonio Spurs

    Quote Originally Posted by Kurosawa0
    Duncan and Robinson were still both double-double caliber bigs in 1999. The Bulls had a woeful front line. They had a mediocre center and undersized power forwards.
    Never mattered much when facing the Ewing Knicks, Shaq Magic of the world ...

    Yeah you have the front line advantage.

    We have the clear cut wing and guard advantages.

    How are you getting the ball to Duncan or D-Rob when Jordan, Brown, and Pippen are smothering your inferior guards?

    That's why we always managed to beat teams with superior front courts. Can't get them the ball when they're being hounded by two of the best guard / wing defenders (both on ball, and help defense) of all-time.


  12. #42
    NBA rookie of the year Kurosawa0's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    6,341

    Default Re: 1998 Chicago Bulls vs. 1999 San Antonio Spurs

    Quote Originally Posted by SwooshReturns
    Never mattered much when facing the Ewing Knicks, Shaq Magic of the world ...

    Yeah you have the front line advantage.

    We have the clear cut wing and guard advantages.

    How are you getting the ball to Duncan or D-Rob when Jordan, Brown, and Pippen are smothering your inferior guards?

    That's why we always managed to beat teams with superior front courts. Can't get them the ball when they're being hounded by two of the best guard / wing defenders (both on ball, and help defense) of all-time.

    We?

    Dear God, never mind...

  13. #43
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    1,906

    Default Re: 1998 Chicago Bulls vs. 1999 San Antonio Spurs

    this going to 7 games.......................i pick bulls

  14. #44
    Local High School Star
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    1,309

    Default Re: 1998 Chicago Bulls vs. 1999 San Antonio Spurs

    lol at people talking like the 2003 Spurs was the worst one. They just kicked the legendary 3-peat Lakers. Pretty sure that Lakers was better than any of those suns or mavs or even pistons they faced in 2005 or 2007. It was TD on his best shape plus many young talents.

  15. #45
    Samurai Swoosh SwooshReturns's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    958

    Default Re: 1998 Chicago Bulls vs. 1999 San Antonio Spurs

    Quote Originally Posted by rzp
    lThey just kicked the legendary 3-peat Lakers.
    2003 Lakers was a roster left to rot outside of Kobe and Shaq.

    Kobe was their best player, Shaq took way too much time to heal an injury ... was a major out of shape fat ass that season, and the Lakers figured they could get cheap and keep winning with just those two guys.

    They were a shell of what they were from 2000 - 2002

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •