-
Good High School Starter
T.Owens
S.Smith
C.Johnson
T.Holt
R.Moss
M.Harrison
H.Ward
S.Moss
L.Fitzgerald
C.Chambers
Rod Smith
R.Wayne
D.Driver
L.Coles
Thats 14 I think are better then Keyshawn. Agree?
-
Goat Loading
That's 14...and I don't really see how the last 4 wide-outs are clearly better then Keyshawn.
-
Goat Loading
Steve Smith
Terrell Owens
Randy Moss
Santana Moss
Larry Fitzgerald
Anguan Boldin
Plaxico Burress
Torry Holt
Marvin Harrison
Chris Chambers
Hines Ward
Chad Johnson
Rod Smith
That's 12 players who I would definitely put above Keyshawn rest are players who either have a great QB and who don't have to share the ball with another great wide-out (Terry Glenn).
Dallas also run the ball alot, they have a very even offensive attack...talent wise I still think he's top 15 with ease. He has some of the best hands in football, very physical...he's basically a more experienced Muhsin Muhammed.
-
Good High School Starter
Originally Posted by West-Side
That's 14...and I don't really see how the last 4 wide-outs are clearly better then Keyshawn.
Why not? Look at thier production. I left off 15 because the rest of the WR's are arguable. Like Plaixco Burress. I forgot Roy Williams but left him off because he has to prove himself imo. I know the talent, I've seen it in games but go out and put up the numbers to back it ya kno? Couple of WR's i left off.
I think Key is anywhere in ther 15-20 range. Just dont think at this point in his career he is top 15. But where he ranks among the rest of the league imo isnt something to get bent out of shape over. He's a perfect compliment to Steve Smith in that you get a possesson WR who can make the tough catches, sacrifice his body over the middle and also block. Steve Smith can do his thing more so hopefully this duo works like you would expect it too. Even if defense focus on Steve still Key is capable of making catches.
-
Goat Loading
Yeah I agree, I personally think he's 12-20...but hey I'll take that, he's a perfect complimentary player for Steve Smith.
-
exercise profits littl
Re: NFL: Best Wide receiver
Originally Posted by 420puffer
Who do you guys think is the best wideout in the NFL? Rank top 3 in order
Here is my opinion
1. TO
2. Steve Smith
3. Fitzgerald
TO hands down
-
Reds/Bengals/Cavs
Re: NFL: Best Wide receiver
My how the times change, although Larry Fitzgerald is still one of the best WR's in the league.
-
Reds/Bengals/Cavs
Re: NFL: Best Wide receiver
Originally Posted by Real Men Wear Green
David Boston was roided up out of his mind. He may be good without the juice but I'm not betting on him.
There's a name I haven't heard in while. That guy had muscles on top of muscles on top of muscles. All from cliff bars and curl ups, no?
-
Re: NFL: Best Wide receiver
Calvin
Andre
Welker
Marshall
Wayne
-
Re: NFL: Best Wide receiver
Calvin got this on lock-down.
I said Randy was the most talented WR ever back in 2006, but Calvin probably overtakes him. All the talent (and arguably more) with none of the drama.
-
Re: NFL: Best Wide receiver
Originally Posted by Carbine
Calvin got this on lock-down.
I said Randy was the most talented WR ever back in 2006, but Calvin probably overtakes him. All the talent (and arguably more) with none of the drama.
No way calvin is more talented, what moss could do was almost unfair. WORLD CLASS OLYMPIC Speed, Vertical, and ball skills
-
Re: NFL: Best Wide receiver
Originally Posted by Goliath Uterus
Lol, Welker isn't the best receiver on his team.
Atleast 112 catches for 5 of the last 6 years..
Have you seen him run routes?? as a guy who played slot I have so much respect for his craft.
D Thomas has to prove some more before I crown him better than Wesley
-
NBA Legend and Hall of Famer
Re: NFL: Best Wide receiver
Wes Welker does basically what Marshall Faulk used to do, except he lines up at the line of scrimmage instead of the backfield and doesn't run the ball. Marshall Faulk was a great receiver in his time, but the top receivers have be able to stretch the field.
-
Re: NFL: Best Wide receiver
Originally Posted by Sarcastic
Wes Welker does basically what Marshall Faulk used to do, except he lines up at the line of scrimmage instead of the backfield and doesn't run the ball. Marshall Faulk was a great receiver in his time, but the top receivers have be able to stretch the field.
But just counting pure wide reciever skills Wes welker is unbelievable to me.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|