-
NBA Finals MVP
Re: We Have Our First Amnesty Victim
Originally Posted by bagelred
This is shocking. I'm serious. Why? Doesn't get them cap space. Doesn't save them much money....I'm floored. Richard Jefferson isn't THAT bad, c'mon.
Why not wait a year?
They WAITED a year. He's just not a Popovich player. Even Grant Hill is an upgrade over him.
-
Stare
Re: We Have Our First Amnesty Victim
Originally Posted by Haymaker
They WAITED a year. He's just not a Popovich player. Even Grant Hill is an upgrade over him.
I know but you want to pay him $30 MILLION just to go away? It's not like he has a bad attitude or is continually injured.....ok he's disappointing, so is half the league! Trade him to the Magic for Turkoglu or something......
Watch for the Detroit Pistons and his old coach Lawrence Frank to make an offer.
-
Re: We Have Our First Amnesty Victim
He'll be a nice addition to a contender for around $3 mill or so a year. Lakers could use him. So could a team like Dallas or Boston. Not sure what the Spurs were thinking...besides the MLE I suppose.
-
My Pimp Hand Is Lethal
Re: We Have Our First Amnesty Victim
Originally Posted by D-Rose
Not sure what the Spurs were thinking...besides the MLE I suppose.
If you watched the Spurs in the second half of the season last year and in the playoffs, you'll know what the Spurs were thinking.
Richard Jefferson sucks.
-
Re: We Have Our First Amnesty Victim
Seriously stunned by how many people STILL don't realize amnestied players ending up on contenders is essentially impossible.
-
I usually hit open layups
Re: We Have Our First Amnesty Victim
Originally Posted by AMISTILLILL
Seriously stunned by how many people STILL don't realize amnestied players ending up on contenders is essentially impossible.
haha funny and also true
-
Stare
Re: We Have Our First Amnesty Victim
Originally Posted by AMISTILLILL
Seriously stunned by how many people STILL don't realize amnestied players ending up on contenders is essentially impossible.
Yup. The secondary waiver rule is absolutely ridiculous....discussion for another thread.
-
Scoring Champ
Re: We Have Our First Amnesty Victim
Originally Posted by bagelred
I know but you want to pay him $30 MILLION just to go away? It's not like he has a bad attitude or is continually injured.....ok he's disappointing, so is half the league! Trade him to the Magic for Turkoglu or something......
It depends on what team decides to cover of his salary.
I could see a team covering $5 Million for RJ yearly which is about what he is worth, and that would only cost San Antonio $15 Million for making the move.
IMO, its a slap in the face to RJ who opted out of his deal to save money for San Antonio. People forget that "weird" decision he made last year to opt out and take a smaller deal from San Antonio.
Yet now that smaller deal is "too much" and they want to amnesty him.
Watch for the Detroit Pistons and his old coach Lawrence Frank to make an offer.
Frank & RJ clashed in New Jersey. Remember?
-
Re: We Have Our First Amnesty Victim
Originally Posted by bagelred
Yup. The secondary waiver rule is absolutely ridiculous....discussion for another thread.
-
Re: Spurs to make Richard Jefferson the first-ever NBA amnesty clause victim!
As a Spurs fan and SA resident, I'm glad this is happening. I gave him as much benefit of the doubt as anybody, he did show some improvement, but simply put, RJ was a waste. A waste of time, money, and effort. It's one thing to say a player has the talent and skill (and Jefferson does), but if his head isn't in the game none of that matters. Too often Jefferson would fade in the second halves a games, his intensity and competitiveness is questionable. He's better suited for a team that's not quite a contender, or on team where less is asked of him. $30 Million dollars over the next three seasons, especially when you consider Duncan may be out of the picture, is alot of money (do you really want to give that money to a questionable player who's on the backside of his career?). It's one thing if you're stuck with that contract, but if you can let him go? why not? He's hurting the Spurs (with the illusion of being a sturdy, dependable SF) more than he's helping/has helped.
-
The Magic are a trash
Re: We Have Our First Amnesty Victim
Originally Posted by Droid101
The original team pays the difference between the original contract and whatever the new team picks up.
The player does not make any more money doing this.
-
Banned
Re: We Have Our First Amnesty Victim
Originally Posted by bagelred
This is shocking. I'm serious. Why? Doesn't get them cap space. Doesn't save them much money....I'm floored. Richard Jefferson isn't THAT bad, c'mon.
Why not wait a year?
It saves San Antonio from hitting the luxury tax by signing Caron Butler. So financially it is worth it this year.
-
5-time NBA All-Star
Re: We Have Our First Amnesty Victim
Is this official?
Seems surprising. Butler is a mild upgrade over Jefferson IF he has recovered well, which no one knows.
That's alot of money to spend when one guy is doing an average job for you already, just to sign someone to do a slightly above average job for you, and he just had a major injury.
Might be more to this.
-
Re: We Have Our First Amnesty Victim
Originally Posted by hawkfan
It saves San Antonio from hitting the luxury tax by signing Caron Butler. So financially it is worth it this year.
this right here. most spurs fans will be glad to have him gone
-
Re: Spurs to make Richard Jefferson the first-ever NBA amnesty clause victim!
Signing Butler, Howard or Battier will be great, but we still gotta upgrade at the bigs.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|