-
NBA rookie of the year
Re: 1998 Chicago Bulls vs. 1999 San Antonio Spurs
Originally Posted by SwooshReturns
But Jordan doesn't choke like that ... .
And yet in 1991, Jordan did miss a potential game winner in the Finals. It happens.
And here's the thing, the 1999 Spurs was better team than the Jazz.
-
NBA rookie of the year
Re: 1998 Chicago Bulls vs. 1999 San Antonio Spurs
Originally Posted by SwooshReturns
Oh really?
I will see you in class then ...
Yes, because a typo is the same as not being able to count to three.
-
Death Before Dishonor
Re: 1998 Chicago Bulls vs. 1999 San Antonio Spurs
Originally Posted by Lebron23
winning 4 titles in the row isnt going to be easy.
not saying the Spurs would just run laps around the Bulls but i think MJ and Pippen might have some tired legs. Not to mention that MJ would be 36
-
NBA Legend
Re: 1998 Chicago Bulls vs. 1999 San Antonio Spurs
'98 Bulls in 5-6. '98 Utah, imho, was better or equal to the '99 Spurs.
Originally Posted by Kurosawa0
Yes, because a typo is the same as not being able to count to three.
Wow, some of you people are really petty. Who gives a sh*t?
Last edited by kuniva_dAMiGhTy; 03-20-2012 at 12:21 PM.
-
Bulls
-
Samurai Swoosh
Re: 1998 Chicago Bulls vs. 1999 San Antonio Spurs
Originally Posted by Kurosawa0
And yet in 1991, Jordan did miss a potential game winner in the Finals. It happens.
Rarely ... he came through more often than not ...
He hit a buzzer beater tying shot in that same series
Hit a game winning buzzer beater in the '93 Finals
Hit a game winning buzzer beater in '97 Finals
Assisted on a game winner in the '97 Finals
Hit a game winning 3 in the '97 Finals (Flu Game)
Hit a game winning shot in the '98 Finals
More often than not ... MJ comes through when you need him to most. That's why he's the best ever.
Originally Posted by Kurosawa0
And here's the thing, the 1999 Spurs was better team than the Jazz.
Honestly think it was marginal at best. Even if they give the Bulls a better series, I don't think they're winning against the '98 Bulls. Which is my opinion on the series.
-
Samurai Swoosh
Re: 1998 Chicago Bulls vs. 1999 San Antonio Spurs
Originally Posted by Kurosawa0
Yes, because a typo is the same as not being able to count to three.
This guy ...
Two "ifs" in sports is too many and too hypothetical for me.
Deal with it, son.
-
Death Before Dishonor
Re: 1998 Chicago Bulls vs. 1999 San Antonio Spurs
good morning Swoosh
beautiful day we are having today once again
-
NBA rookie of the year
Re: 1998 Chicago Bulls vs. 1999 San Antonio Spurs
Duncan and Robinson were still both double-double caliber bigs in 1999. The Bulls had a woeful front line. They had a mediocre center and undersized power forwards.
It would be possible that Duncan could be the best player in the series.
-
Samurai Swoosh
Re: 1998 Chicago Bulls vs. 1999 San Antonio Spurs
Originally Posted by Bigsmoke
good morning Swoosh
beautiful day we are having today once again
I know man ... it's been like a week straight and I don't want to jinx things, but it's been feeling like straight early June in the Chi.
-
Samurai Swoosh
Re: 1998 Chicago Bulls vs. 1999 San Antonio Spurs
Originally Posted by Kurosawa0
Duncan and Robinson were still both double-double caliber bigs in 1999. The Bulls had a woeful front line. They had a mediocre center and undersized power forwards.
Never mattered much when facing the Ewing Knicks, Shaq Magic of the world ...
Yeah you have the front line advantage.
We have the clear cut wing and guard advantages.
How are you getting the ball to Duncan or D-Rob when Jordan, Brown, and Pippen are smothering your inferior guards?
That's why we always managed to beat teams with superior front courts. Can't get them the ball when they're being hounded by two of the best guard / wing defenders (both on ball, and help defense) of all-time.
-
NBA rookie of the year
Re: 1998 Chicago Bulls vs. 1999 San Antonio Spurs
Originally Posted by SwooshReturns
Never mattered much when facing the Ewing Knicks, Shaq Magic of the world ...
Yeah you have the front line advantage.
We have the clear cut wing and guard advantages.
How are you getting the ball to Duncan or D-Rob when Jordan, Brown, and Pippen are smothering your inferior guards?
That's why we always managed to beat teams with superior front courts. Can't get them the ball when they're being hounded by two of the best guard / wing defenders (both on ball, and help defense) of all-time.
We?
Dear God, never mind...
-
Re: 1998 Chicago Bulls vs. 1999 San Antonio Spurs
this going to 7 games.......................i pick bulls
-
Re: 1998 Chicago Bulls vs. 1999 San Antonio Spurs
lol at people talking like the 2003 Spurs was the worst one. They just kicked the legendary 3-peat Lakers. Pretty sure that Lakers was better than any of those suns or mavs or even pistons they faced in 2005 or 2007. It was TD on his best shape plus many young talents.
-
Samurai Swoosh
Re: 1998 Chicago Bulls vs. 1999 San Antonio Spurs
Originally Posted by rzp
lThey just kicked the legendary 3-peat Lakers.
2003 Lakers was a roster left to rot outside of Kobe and Shaq.
Kobe was their best player, Shaq took way too much time to heal an injury ... was a major out of shape fat ass that season, and the Lakers figured they could get cheap and keep winning with just those two guys.
They were a shell of what they were from 2000 - 2002
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|