Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234
Results 46 to 59 of 59
  1. #46
    From Out Of Nowhere chains5000's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Bilbao
    Posts
    8,103

    Default Re: Mo out indefinitely, Jazz "bigs" trade soon?

    Quote Originally Posted by Purch
    Trade both of them. Start building around Favors/Kanter now.


    I kinda wanna trade with the Spurs cause I'm really high on that De Colo dude. Think the spurs found another gem
    Like his game but I don't think he's that good to be thought of as being a big part of a trade. IMO he'll be a good backup, no more.
    (I've only watched him play in Europe, never in NBA games)

  2. #47
    Local High School Star barkleynash's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    1,014

    Default Re: Mo out indefinitely, Jazz "bigs" trade soon?

    Bargs and Calderon and pietrus for Jefferson and burks

  3. #48
    NBA Legend and Hall of Famer Xiao Yao You's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Midvale, Utah, U.S.A.
    Posts
    49,697

    Default Re: Mo out indefinitely, Jazz "bigs" trade soon?

    Jazz don't need Bargs. Need a 3rd team. Not sure anyone needs him though? A highly paid stretch big that does little else.

  4. #49
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    4,375

    Default Re: Mo out indefinitely, Jazz "bigs" trade soon?

    Quote Originally Posted by barkleynash
    Bargs and Calderon and pietrus for Jefferson and burks
    What about this: http://espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=c7rfepv

    Barg, Lowry, JLIII for Jefferson and Burks

  5. #50
    Good college starter Rubio2Gasol's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    3,357

    Default Re: Mo out indefinitely, Jazz "bigs" trade soon?

    Quote Originally Posted by DMV2
    What about this: http://espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=c7rfepv

    Barg, Lowry, JLIII for Jefferson and Burks
    Why would they trade Lowry?

    Don't get me wrong I like Burks but trading Lowry makes no sense. Calderon would make infinitely more sense.

  6. #51
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    4,375

    Default Re: Mo out indefinitely, Jazz "bigs" trade soon?

    Quote Originally Posted by Rubio2Gasol
    Why would they trade Lowry?

    Don't get me wrong I like Burks but trading Lowry makes no sense. Calderon would make infinitely more sense.
    Because I want him instead of Calderon.

  7. #52
    Please clap. Real Men Wear Green's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Boston, MA
    Posts
    28,785

    Default Re: Mo out indefinitely, Jazz "bigs" trade soon?

    Quote Originally Posted by Rubio2Gasol
    Why would they trade Lowry?

    Don't get me wrong I like Burks but trading Lowry makes no sense. Calderon would make infinitely more sense.
    There has to be some real value to go after Big Al. The original deal isn't that good. Take out Lowry? Yuck.

  8. #53
    NBA Legend and Hall of Famer Xiao Yao You's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Midvale, Utah, U.S.A.
    Posts
    49,697

    Default Re: Mo out indefinitely, Jazz "bigs" trade soon?

    Quote Originally Posted by Rubio2Gasol
    Why would they trade Lowry?

    Don't get me wrong I like Burks but trading Lowry makes no sense. Calderon would make infinitely more sense.
    You'd think but rumor has it they want to keep Calderon and deal Lowry.

    Why would the Jazz want Bargnani or Lucas? They'd have 5 pg's and have to cut someone.

  9. #54
    . blablabla's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Austria
    Posts
    6,245

    Default Re: Mo out indefinitely, Jazz "bigs" trade soon?

    the Kings could use Millsap, not sure what the they can trade tho

  10. #55
    L alenleomessi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    10,774

    Default Re: Mo out indefinitely, Jazz "bigs" trade soon?

    millsap or big al for tyreke?

  11. #56
    #Dre Day in Sac Town andremiller07's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    6,760

    Default Re: Mo out indefinitely, Jazz "bigs" trade soon?

    Quote Originally Posted by alenleomessi
    millsap or big al for tyreke?
    For the Kings to have a good use for Milsap would mean us having to trade Jason Thompson/Thomas Robinson as well as Tyreke. Without moving JT/T-Rob moving Tyreke straight up for Big Al/Milsap is pointless we don't really get better as a team since Tyreke is the only legit shot creator we have on the wing/guard spot.

    I would love Milsap over JT ad JT can back up Favours/Kanter but unless we can get a scoring/creating SG/SF in return I say no. Evans when he has not been injured and running the point has excelled this year.

    The only way they might do Milsap/Big Al for Evans is if they move Cousins first.
    Last edited by andremiller07; 12-29-2012 at 07:47 AM.

  12. #57
    Very good NBA starter wally_world's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Dancin' with Miley
    Posts
    8,406

    Default Re: Mo out indefinitely, Jazz "bigs" trade soon?

    Quote Originally Posted by Rekindled
    they need to trade for Jimmer, its destiny
    I'd say thats quite possible.

    As a Thunder fan,

    Al Jefferson + Marvin Williams + Tinsley + Bell
    for
    Perkins + Kevin Martin + Reggie Jackson + Toronto's Pick

    Mo Williams / Reggie Jackson / Earl Watson
    Kev Martin / Foye / Burks
    Hayward / Carroll
    Millsap / Favors / Evans
    Perkins / Kanter

    Westbrook / Maynor / Tinsley
    Sefolosha / Lamb / Bell
    Durant / Marvin Williams
    Ibaka / Collison / PJ3
    Jefferson / Thabeet

    Utah gets a lottery pick to build for the future. Jackson is a good PG to start until Mo returns, and is cheap for another 2 years. Martin is an expirer and a short term solution at SG. Perk, though regarded useless by most, is a solid lockerroom presence to help Utah make the playoffs. He also warrants less minutes/shots to make room for the growth of Favors/Kanter. His contract is bad, but Marvin Williams makes more (but for one less year).

    Thunders get the low-post scoring big they lack. Tinsley is a veteran looking to win a chip. Marvin Williams is a solid backup. Raja Bell can be useful if he can revitalize his career with a contender, could end up being a terrific pick up. Bell being a proven playoff performer is also an insurance in case Lamb doesnt pan out.

  13. #58
    Rich Manning is my dad Vancouver-Grizz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    1,782

    Default Re: Mo out indefinitely, Jazz "bigs" trade soon?

    The Answer is the Answer!!!

    Sign AI.... He will be a great hit with the morms....

    Get it done!

  14. #59
    NBA Legend and Hall of Famer Xiao Yao You's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Midvale, Utah, U.S.A.
    Posts
    49,697

    Default Re: Mo out indefinitely, Jazz "bigs" trade soon?

    Quote Originally Posted by wally_world
    I'd say thats quite possible.

    As a Thunder fan,

    Al Jefferson + Marvin Williams + Tinsley + Bell
    for
    Perkins + Kevin Martin + Reggie Jackson + Toronto's Pick

    Mo Williams / Reggie Jackson / Earl Watson
    Kev Martin / Foye / Burks
    Hayward / Carroll
    Millsap / Favors / Evans
    Perkins / Kanter

    Westbrook / Maynor / Tinsley
    Sefolosha / Lamb / Bell
    Durant / Marvin Williams
    Ibaka / Collison / PJ3
    Jefferson / Thabeet

    Utah gets a lottery pick to build for the future. Jackson is a good PG to start until Mo returns, and is cheap for another 2 years. Martin is an expirer and a short term solution at SG. Perk, though regarded useless by most, is a solid lockerroom presence to help Utah make the playoffs. He also warrants less minutes/shots to make room for the growth of Favors/Kanter. His contract is bad, but Marvin Williams makes more (but for one less year).

    Thunders get the low-post scoring big they lack. Tinsley is a veteran looking to win a chip. Marvin Williams is a solid backup. Raja Bell can be useful if he can revitalize his career with a contender, could end up being a terrific pick up. Bell being a proven playoff performer is also an insurance in case Lamb doesnt pan out.
    I like it other than Perkins. He makes it a no. The whole idea of getting rid of Jefferson is to play the young guys not pay a 4th big more money than the 3 ahead of him(at least until Millsap gets his money next year and Favors the next. Marvin has an ETO which makes him a possible expirer too. The lottery is for the next draft right? Supposed to be a horrible draft! I doubt Oklahoma wants to get rid of Martin right now anyway.

    http://espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=bm9ymdl

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •