Foreskin> No Foreskin?

[red1]

Negged for being a faqgot

Edit: I made you lose a bar
[/IMG]

I can honestly say IDGAF. I was wondering how you negged me twice, just realized that it must be because you have multiple accounts. So not only are you the little b*tch who goes around negging people while posing as other posters, you also go around repping yourself while having conversations and agreeing with yourself.

Lmao just pathetic

[red1]

Noooo please don't neg me, your soooo big dick will hurt me.

Retard.

Negged for being a faqgot

Edit: I made you lose a bar

LMAO the green bar is back bitch! And you still have an anteater

[-p.tiddy-]

found a study for what women prefer...

http://www.mattersofsize.com/forum/s...r-Circumcision

TABLE ONE

Activity ***** Type

Circumcised (%) Uncircumcised (%) Either (%)
Sexual Intercourse

71 6 23

Looking at to Achieve sexual arousal
76 4 20


Giving manual

penile stimulation
75 5 20

Giving Fellatio
83 2 15

looks like blow jobs side heavy without foreskin the most...

[Just2McFly]

Circumcised dudes are trying so hard to validate their situation. As long as you wash your dick and have safe sex, you aren't going to get any diseases plus sex feels better. These are facts.

[Stuckey]

not gonna lie, as a non circumcised guy, sometimes the skin gets in the way even at full capacity; having said that, I do prefer more sensitivity

[rufuspaul]

Ridiculous comparison? You are the one who made it in the first place. Calling circumcision a minor plastic procedure similar to a nosejob.

The thing is, even if it was just a minor plastic procedure that had no impact at all, does that make it right? You condone of parents putting babies through plastic surgery? Maybe I don't like the ears of the baby, or the skin color, or whatever. It's perfectly fine to do minor medical procedures to alter those things then?

You also think that circumcision for girls is a minor medical procedure that should be 100% the parent's right to perform? I'm sure the girls who grow up that way don't know what they are missing either.

Why do you keep comparing a piece of skin around the head of your dick to a major body part connected to one's head?

Anyway I'm glad I was circumcised but if I wasn't it wouldn't be all that big a deal. Kind of like an appendix. Pretty useless and innocuous as long as it doesn't get infected.

[LJJ]

it would be different if there were thousands, or even hundreds of circumcised men wishing they had their foreskin

but there really aren't any...I'm sure you can find a couple out there but for the most part men who are circumcised are very happy to be that way.

Why not argue the other way and say it would be different if there were billions of men getting circumcisions in adulthood because of all the great benefits like desensitized genitalia. The fact is the adults around the world getting circumcisions for anything other than religious or medical reasons remain virtually nonexistent.

But that said, what's the reason for making this decision for your infant? Why make this irreversible decision for babies? Why do people have the right? I consider my dick to be pretty important, if anyone is going to make a decision to cut my dick it's going to be me.

Why do you keep comparing a piece of skin around the head of your dick to a major body part connected to one's head?

Anyway I'm glad I was circumcised but if I wasn't it wouldn't be all that big a deal. Kind of like an appendix. Pretty useless and innocuous as long as it doesn't get infected.

Read back the thread. You are the one who started the comparison of circumcision to a nosejob, not me. You said there is no difference between the two.

[bmulls]

You can tell with 100% accuracy who is circumcised and who is rocking the elephant trunk in this thread.

[LamarOdom]

I can honestly say IDGAF. I was wondering how you negged me twice, just realized that it must be because you have multiple accounts. So not only are you the little b*tch who goes around negging people while posing as other posters, you also go around repping yourself while having conversations and agreeing with yourself.

Lmao just pathetic

Nah brah I only got one account but tbh I've been tryin to get another but Jeff never verified that acc. And why got negged twice is because you are retarded.

[Money 23]

Circumcised dudes are trying so hard to validate their situation. As long as you wash your dick and have safe sex, you aren't going to get any diseases plus sex feels better. These are facts.

Why go through all that work, and just get it circumcised?

The thing looks like an alien when stuff gets peeled back. Hideous.

Never see guys in porn with un-cut pecker woods.

[TheMan]

found a study for what women prefer...

http://www.mattersofsize.com/forum/s...r-Circumcision



looks like blow jobs side heavy without foreskin the most...

That study was done in the US where until recently the cultural norm was to circumcize, so obviously women's opinions would go along those lines. Only 10% of European men and 20 % in general worldwide are circumcized. Do a study of European women and you'll get way different numbers.

Circumcisions are rapidly dropping in the US btw...

New research about a steep drop in circumcisions made headlines this past week. According to one federal researcher, circumcision rates in U.S. hospitals slid from 56 percent in 2006 to fewer than a third of boys born last year.

Doctors caution that those numbers aren't definitive -- for instance, they don't include circumcisions not covered by insurance policies or circumcisions performed in religious settings.

But Dr. Douglas Diekema, a pediatrics bioethicist at the University of Washington, tells NPR's Audie Cornish there's no doubt about the overall trend.

"I think all of us agree there probably is a decrease in the number of circumcisions over time, and that's probably a result of a number of factors," Diekema says.

"About 10 years ago, the American Academy of Pediatrics came out with a policy statement that was fairly neutral on whether circumcisions should be recommended for newborns or not," says Diekema. "And that probably changed the way physicians were talking to their families."

In many states, Medicaid stopped covering the procedure as a result of that policy statement. And many insurance companies followed suit, meaning that more and more families might have decided to forgo circumcision just because of the expense.

"It's also worth pointing out that our population is becoming increasingly Hispanic," says Diekema, "And that's a population that has not traditionally circumcised their babies."

'Intactivists'

Another possible explanation for the decrease might be the anti-circumcision advocates known as "intactivists." They've lobbied forcefully against circumcision for years now, and some people compare them to anti-vaccination advocates. But Diekema criticizes their tactics.

"Their arguments are largely emotional," says Diekema. "Just the fact that they insist on referring to this as 'genital mutilation' tells you that they're refusing to recognize whether there may be any medical benefit to the procedure."

And the benefits are large, he says.

"There is a fairly substantial, important reduction in the risk of contracting many sexually transmitted infections," says Diekema. "In newborns, there is a decreased likelihood of getting a urinary tract infection, which for a newborn baby can be a very significant illness."

And, he says, "at least three well-done, randomized control trials in Africa show a substantial decrease in the transmission of HIV [due to circumcision]."

Ultimately, in spite of arguments on both sides of the issue, Diekema says that male circumcision is a decision that families should make on their own. He says a doctor's role is to make sure the family is aware of the risks and benefits of the procedure.

But, he says, "the risks of circumcision are considerably lower in the newborn population than they are if that child is older." [Copyright 2012 National Public Radio]

[red1]

Nah brah I only got one account but tbh I've been tryin to get another but Jeff never verified that acc. And why got negged twice is because you are retarded.

Why you lying for? This ain't the first time you negged twice using different accounts. Then again what would you expect from a bitch who reps and agrees with himself using multiple accounts.

lmao pathetic, going through all that effort

[-p.tiddy-]

Why not argue the other way and say it would be different if there were billions of men getting circumcisions in adulthood because of all the great benefits like desensitized genitalia. The fact is the adults around the world getting circumcisions for anything other than religious or medical reasons remain virtually nonexistent.

But that said, what's the reason for making this decision for your infant? Why make this irreversible decision for babies? Why do people have the right? I consider my dick to be pretty important, if anyone is going to make a decision to cut my dick it's going to be me.

it's because it is 100x easier to do as an infant than a full grown adult who gets erections that would gush mas amounts of blood...

[-p.tiddy-]

That study was done in the US where until recently the cultural norm was to circumcize, so obviously women's opinions would go along those lines. Only 10% of European men and 20 % in general worldwide are circumcized. Do a study of European women and you'll get way different numbers.

Circumcisions are rapidly dropping in the US btw...

doctors saying it is beneficial says a lot imo

And the benefits are large, he says.

"There is a fairly substantial, important reduction in the risk of contracting many sexually transmitted infections," says Diekema. "In newborns, there is a decreased likelihood of getting a urinary tract infection, which for a newborn baby can be a very significant illness."

And, he says, "at least three well-done, randomized control trials in Africa show a substantial decrease in the transmission of HIV [due to circumcision]."

I am betting that the % drop of procedures in the US is right in line with the % drop of white people

[LJJ]

it's because it is 100x easier to do as an infant than a full grown adult who gets erections that would gush mas amounts of blood...

You are completely wrong, they give you pills for that.

Stop trying to rationalize why it should be a parent's right to mutilate their child. You want a circumcision? You can get it. As far as medical procedures go it's not a big thing.