-
Re: What's the difference between Superstar and All-star?
Originally Posted by MaxFly
Samurai Swoosh for the win... Couldn't have said it better myself.
MaxFly, what you been up to man?
-
Dishonest, awful excuse of a fan
Re: What's the difference between Superstar and All-star?
The only superstar in the NBA is Kobe Bryant. He has 1 billion fans.
-
Keyless' gimmick acct
Re: What's the difference between Superstar and All-star?
superstars get calls. all stars get 1 free throw attempt in a playoff game despite driving to the rim repeatedly, and even taking body checks on two dunk attempts.
[color=white]actually, i'm of the opinion that superstars are top tier players whose popularity transcends the game. generally speaking, if a million 10 year olds wear a guy's jersey and think he can cure cancer by smiling at them, you're talking about a superstar.
the rest of my post was just for kicks. the blazers lost fairly, although i do think Roy should have had 6 more FTA in the game. those wouldn't have helped at all, so... meh. no biggie.[/color]
1. attempt.
-
National High School Star
Re: What's the difference between Superstar and All-star?
If you have to ask this question you shouldn't be on this board...
-
Re: What's the difference between Superstar and All-star?
Originally Posted by iLoveNBA
I would like somebody to tell me the difference, I don't think their is an exact definition, but what would your definition be?
A LITTLE BIT OF TALENT AND THE REFS SUPPORT...
-
Re: What's the difference between Superstar and All-star?
Originally Posted by GiveItToBurrito
I'd say that Melo flirted with superstardom, but he never lived up to the hype and disappointed in the clutch too often. He could still be a superstar if he takes over a playoff series, though. Pierce is a great player, but he spent a long time being kind of an afterthought in the league, since Boston was mediocre for so long. I think you could make a case that any team with a superstar on it will be good enough to win at least 35 games, whereas a sub-35 win team could have multiple all-star caliber players (see: Wizards, Washington).
THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN SUPERSTARS AND SAY ALLSTARS IS GETTING CALLS... That is usually the big difference...
-
Re: What's the difference between Superstar and All-star?
Originally Posted by GiveItToBurrito
I'd say that Melo flirted with superstardom, but he never lived up to the hype and disappointed in the clutch too often. He could still be a superstar if he takes over a playoff series, though. Pierce is a great player, but he spent a long time being kind of an afterthought in the league, since Boston was mediocre for so long. I think you could make a case that any team with a superstar on it will be good enough to win at least 35 games, whereas a sub-35 win team could have multiple all-star caliber players (see: Wizards, Washington).
Wrong Melo just hasn't had the talent to win a title.. Put Melo on the Lakers and get rid of Kobe and the Lakers still have a good chance of winning a title.. Not as good as having Kobe on that team but a very good chance this year since KG is gone...
-
Re: What's the difference between Superstar and All-star?
Originally Posted by iLoveNBA
So would these players be superstars or all-stars?
Dirk, Dwight, Yao, Melo, Pierce?
they would all be considered superstars if they played on a team that highlighted their skills.. Pierce looked like the best player in the world last playoffs. Mainly because he had a good team around him...
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|