Guys you wouldn't believe this, but i found a sure-win way to play roulette.

[tgan3]

okay...give me a little time...

just going here:

http://www.freeroulette.com/Roulette.html

first one on google...I think all the odds are correct as in Vegas...

this is gonna take a little time for me to get down, just hold on...

Also, I forgot to tell u. This works better if you play in a roulette with one "0". common sense. If you're playing with 2 "0"'s, it might not work, or maybe not as well.

since the link you showed me is a roulette with 2 "0"'s.

[~primetime~]

after exactly 100 spins my profit was $314

there has to be something that is missing here, some kind of "juice" that the casino takes that is not there on free sites or something...

also, I don't realy understand WHY this works, but my first try was defenatly a success...


I am going to try again later on another web site...I will give my results

after gettin the system down (takes about 20-30 spins to get the hang of it)...it does seem fairly easy though, I don't see how this is something that could have gone unseen for hundreds of years...lol

if for whatever reason this is real, please don't share it with anyone else...

[pete's montreux]

now im interested

[Knuck the Ficks]

PM me the strategy and I'll look it over.

I'm skeptical though, roulette is an extremely simple game - with independent trials and expected loss I don't see how you could formulate a "sure-in" way to play it.

[pete's montreux]

I would like details as well.

[enayes]

Hi tgan3, can you send me a pm?

I wanna try it out too.

[~primetime~]

tgan3

please don't PM this out to anyone else...PLEASE

let me make sure there is something wrong first...

[pete's montreux]

what a greedy prick you are

[Knuck the Ficks]

tgan3

please don't PM this out to anyone else...PLEASE

Someone's desperate.

tgan3: I'm not an idiot like primetime who thinks that hijacking your strategy will net him enough money to buy three casinos, Pixar and Microsoft. I'm a student of statistics and probability (like you I presume) and am curious to see how a sure-win strategy for roulette could be developed.

[HAzE024]

Someone's desperate.

tgan3: I'm not an idiot like primetime who thinks that hijacking your strategy will net him enough money to buy three casinos, Pixar and Microsoft. I'm a student of statistics and probability (like you I presume) and am curious to see how a sure-win strategy for roulette could be developed.

ditto.

I'm a mathematician, hopefully I can shed some light on the situation?

[~primetime~]

I'm not a mathematician, but this is a good read for soon-to-be gamblers.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gambler%27s_fallacy

his system includes some of that^^^ which made me right away roll my eyes...but then he replied later as to why it is different here...I don't get though really...

some stuff I found:

[QUOTE][I]Specific betting systems

The numerous even-money bets in roulette have inspired many players over the years to attempt to beat the game by [COLOR="Red"]using one or more variations of a Martingale betting strategy[/COLOR], wherein the gamer doubles the bet after every loss, so that the first win would recover all previous losses, plus win a profit equal to the original bet. The problem with this strategy is that, remembering that past results do not affect the future, it is possible for the player to lose so many times in a row, that the player, doubling and redoubling his bets, either runs out of money or hits the table limit. A large financial loss is certain in the long term if the player continued to employ this strategy. Another strategy is the Fibonacci system, where bets are calculated according to the Fibonacci sequence. Regardless of the specific progression, no such strategy can statistically overcome the casino's advantage, since the expected value of each allowed bet is negative.

While not a strategy to win money, former Los Angeles Times editor Andr

[~primetime~]

then there is this:

[QUOTE]In larger casinos, the maximum table limit is higher, so you can double 7, 8, or 9 times without exceeding the limit. However, in order to end up with twice your initial bankroll, you must play even longer. The calculations produce the same results. The probabilities are overwhelming that you will reach the bust streak before you can even double your bankroll.

[COLOR="Red"]The conclusion is that players using Martingale strategy pose no threat to a casino. [/COLOR]The odds are high that the player will go bust before he is able even to double his money.

Table limits are not specifically designed to prevent players from using Martingale strategy. The table limits exist so that the casino is not gambling more money than they can afford to lose. Statistics[citation needed] as of January 2009 show that the 29 roulette wheels in Downtown gaming Las Vegas average a win amount of $1,114 per day for the last year. Most casinos have a $500 dollar table limit[citation needed] so that they are not risking too much money on a few spins. A casino is a business; and, like any other business, it has to worry about cash flow. Casinos are required to keep enough cash on hand to pay off a reasonable expectation of a gambler's windfall. A small casino with a pit that normally takes in $12

[~primetime~]

I will now try 100 spins on bodog:

http://casino.bodog.com/free-roulette.jsp


will post the results...

since I am used to it now it shouldn't take too long, less than an hour I think


edit: I have a feeling that the extra green slot could be the difference in this thing, as his system onlly sees a roulette board that only has 1 zero...

[pst]

The problem with these strategies is that they all work in the short term. With martingale, 100-200 spins is usually pretty damn successful...but the data set isn't large enough. When you stretch the data set out (thousands of spins), however, the "outlier data" begins to show itself and ruins your gains.

ANYstrategy that double down will fail in the long run. What happens when you are wrong 16 times in a row (it will happen)? The answer: a blown account.

[bagelred]

The very basic strategy to "win" at Roulette is to simply bet black or red. Pick one.

Put $5 on black. You win great. Then switch to red.

If you lose the $5 on black. Double it on black. If you win, make back your loss and win $5. Switch to red. If you lose double again.

Essentially, you keep doubling and doubling until you win a bet. Then just start over. You'll consistently make $5 slowly but surely.

Problem is if you keep doubling and doubling and hit like 10 reds/blacks in a row and keep losing. You are f-cked. You'll either reach the table limit or you'll run out of money.



There is no way to win in roulette. The odds can never be in your favor.