Seems like a block of trash here...
1) You talk about rating Gordon on 1 series? That alone tells everyone to just disregard your opinion. Gordon has been dominating in the playoffs for the last 3 postseason appearances. He has 5 "premier" scoring seasons under his belt, while you are comparing him to Nate who only has 1 good scoring season, and no playoff experience.
2) Gordon has always been a better scorer than Deng, Gordon has always been a better scorer than Hinrich.
Is there anything to debate there?
3) Hinrich was never a borderline star. He got this "captain Kirk" title, and all these comparisons to possibly being Nash, but he's never lived up. He is a solid player, and many teams could use him, but if we are talking about who is closer to being worth their contract between Gordon, & Deng... Hinrich EASILY comes in last place without a doubt. Gordon is closer to being worth $10M, and Deng worth $11M, than Hinrich ever will for being worth $9M+.