Building 7 (WTC) Collapse (different angle)

[RedBlackAttack]

You said it was impossible for a building to fall on its side.

Actually, he said it is impossible for a building the size of WTC7 to fall on its side. This thread is just one, big, giant

[-playmaker-]

You said it was impossible for a building to fall on its side.

a building as big as WTC #7...

it is IMPOSSIBLE....it is too f*ckin big...


it isn't the leaning tower of Pisa

[bagelred]

the damage building 7 took is 10x bigger thn that building...

You are just making stuff up. WHAT DAMAGE? I see smoke. That smoke is from the adjacent buildings on fire. There is barely, if any, damage to WTC7 based on all the pictures we saw.

Not only that, but even if there WAS DAMAGE, the building would fall SIDEWAYS. Not straight down.

[bagelred]

a building as big as WTC #7...

it is IMPOSSIBLE....it is too f*ckin big...


it isn't the leaning tower of Pisa

You are ignorant. Stop posting.

[LA KB24]

they won't watch it...

all they know is that it fell straight down as opposed to on it's side, at the speed of gravity as opposed to slow motion...so that mean the entire building was rigged with bombs...

Yeah man, if I built a badass building, I'd want it to fall and destroy everything else in the area so I'm not the only one who has to rebuild.

[-playmaker-]

^^^ there is the same damage...covered in smoke

see that grid?...that is where the side of building 7 used to be...at the base of the building...

it got WRECKED...badly

^^^ that damage

[-playmaker-]

^^^ the falling debris took out half the freakin base of building 7...


how conveinant that they just happen to rig the building that took the most damage...

this conspiracy is RETARDED!!!

^^^ that damage

[LA KB24]

Ahem...

Yeah, bro.

The demolition crew stripped all of the sheet rocks and carpet, and drilled thousands of holes in the concrete, and then ran miles and miles of wiring through the building without anyone noticing.


Makes perfect sense.

[-playmaker-]

^^^ can something that large fall sidways?


NO...just use common sense and think about it...

[Sarcastic]

Actually, he said it is impossible for a building the size of WTC7 to fall on its side. This thread is just one, big, giant

This is the exact quote:

it is lieterally IMPOSSIBLE for something that big to fall on it's side

What is the cutoff when a building becomes too big to fall on it's side? Is it 19 stories it will fall on its side, but 20 it won't?

[LA KB24]

Not only that, but even if there WAS DAMAGE, the building would fall SIDEWAYS. Not straight down.

http://insidehoops.com/forum/showpos...&postcount=219

[Sarcastic]

^^^ that damage

= this



The one on the bottom left. That little nick.

[tontoz]

You are just making stuff up. WHAT DAMAGE? I see smoke. That smoke is from the adjacent buildings on fire. There is barely, if any, damage to WTC7 based on all the pictures we saw.

Not only that, but even if there WAS DAMAGE, the building would fall SIDEWAYS. Not straight down.

Obviously you are not very familiar with how gravity works. And a 20 story hole at the base corner of the building qualifies as a bit more than barely any damage.

[-playmaker-]

= this



The one on the bottom left. That little nick.

LOOK AT THAT SHIT!!!

the entire f*cking center of the building got taken out...AT THE BASE!!!


yet you think they just happen to spend weeks rigging THAT building???




how convienant that they rig the building that took the most damage...

"cause that building had all the secret documents!!!!"

or...

"the evil government needed the insurance money for building 7, and they will kill thousands to get it...!!!"

[tontoz]

= this


The one on the bottom left. That little nick.

That "little nick" was 20 stories high, retard.