-
You hear that?
Re: Building 7 (WTC) Collapse (different angle)
Originally Posted by Sarcastic
EXACTLY.
No building had ever fallen due to fire.
EVER.
Are you ok? like I hope you haven't been brain washed.
No building has ever been hit with a passenger jet plane full of jet feul.
No building has had 220 story building fall on it.
-
NBA Legend
Re: Building 7 (WTC) Collapse (different angle)
Originally Posted by tontoz
You didn't answer the question.
Why were they pulled out of WTC7 since, according to you, it is a "fact" that there was only superficial damage to the building and small fires?
*CRICKETS*
-
NBA Legend and Hall of Famer
Re: Building 7 (WTC) Collapse (different angle)
Originally Posted by tontoz
*CRICKETS*
Because they were told to.
-
NBA Legend and Hall of Famer
Re: Building 7 (WTC) Collapse (different angle)
Originally Posted by Bladers
Are you ok? like I hope you haven't been brain washed.
No building has ever been hit with a passenger jet plane full of jet feul.
No building has had 220 story building fall on it.
None of those things happened to WTC7.
-
NBA Legend
Re: Building 7 (WTC) Collapse (different angle)
Originally Posted by Sarcastic
Because they were told to.
Like i said you still haven't answered the question.
Why were they told to pull out of a building that "only had superficial damage and small fires"?
Last edited by tontoz; 09-29-2010 at 11:26 AM.
-
Puck
Fan in the Stands (unregistered)
Re: Building 7 (WTC) Collapse (different angle)
Originally Posted by Sarcastic
It's weird that engineers were able to predict that WTC 7 would come down, but no one could predict that either WTC 1 nor 2 would come down. If they did, they could have "pulled" out the firemen in them, and saved their lives.
Are you stupid? They just witness two towers collapse, isn't it logical to think that WTC 7, that had structural damage as well as fires burning for close to seven hours, to collapse also? Is this really too hard to believe?
-
NBA Legend and Hall of Famer
Re: Building 7 (WTC) Collapse (different angle)
Originally Posted by Puck
Are you stupid? They just witness two towers collapse, isn't it logical to think that WTC 7, that had structural damage as well as fires burning for close to seven hours, to collapse also? Is this really too hard to believe?
But they didn't think the same thing about any of the other buildings (Verizon, post office).
Ok. If you say so.
-
NBA Legend and Hall of Famer
Re: Building 7 (WTC) Collapse (different angle)
Originally Posted by tontoz
Like i said you still haven't answered the question.
Why were they told to pull out of a building that "only had superficial damage and small fires"?
I have been posting facts, not opinions.
-
Puck
Fan in the Stands (unregistered)
Re: Building 7 (WTC) Collapse (different angle)
Originally Posted by Sarcastic
But they didn't think the same thing about any of the other buildings (Verizon, post office).
Ok. If you say so.
So?
-
NBA Legend
Re: Building 7 (WTC) Collapse (different angle)
Originally Posted by Sarcastic
I have been posting facts, not opinions.
No you haven't. The "small fires and superficial damage" comment was a light year away from a fact.
So lets try again.
Why were the firemen ordered to pull out of the building?
-
NBA Legend and Hall of Famer
Re: Building 7 (WTC) Collapse (different angle)
Originally Posted by tontoz
No you haven't. The "small fires and superficial damage" comment was a light year away from a fact.
So lets try again.
Why were the firemen ordered to pull out of the building?
No it's not.
-
NBA Legend and Hall of Famer
Re: Building 7 (WTC) Collapse (different angle)
Here watch this again. This is the lobby of WTC7. There is at least no inferno down there. The fires were stories up. The damage was so superficial in the lobby that the glass doors didn't even break.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vy-zY1r9zzU#t=6m41s
-
Re: Building 7 (WTC) Collapse (different angle)
Originally Posted by Sarcastic
Here watch this again. This is the lobby of WTC7. There is at least no inferno down there. The fires were stories up. The damage was so superficial in the lobby that the glass doors didn't even break.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vy-zY1r9zzU#t=6m41s
you mean like the broken glass window they climbed through to enter the building
-
Puck
Fan in the Stands (unregistered)
Re: Building 7 (WTC) Collapse (different angle)
Originally Posted by Sarcastic
No it's not.
Superficial?
Really?
-
You hear that?
Re: Building 7 (WTC) Collapse (different angle)
Originally Posted by Sarcastic
Here watch this again. This is the lobby of WTC7. There is at least no inferno down there. The fires were stories up. The damage was so superficial in the lobby that the glass doors didn't even break.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vy-zY1r9zzU#t=6m41s
Thats the first floor, and I posted that to show you the damage, How did all that stuff get in there?
Magically just appeared?
Or were the windows broken through?
Edit: also the glass door he enter through was broken, watch it again!
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|