Page 1 of 9 1234 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 126
  1. #1
    the Sho Kosugi of ISH -p.tiddy-'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    -dallas, texas-
    Posts
    11,183

    Default NFL Re-Draft By Gil Brandt


  2. #2
    Bulls | Bears | W. Sox ballinhun8's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Ehhhh, BANDWAGON BOSTON
    Posts
    6,627

    Default Re: NFL Re-Draft By Gil Brandt

    Why a re-draft article after only 8 weeks??? Too soon.




    Oh, and Daniel Thomas has been good enough when healthy for the Fins. Murray had the luxury of playing two of the worst run defenses. Two games doesn't and shouldn't put him in Round 1. Same for my boy Carimi too.

  3. #3
    the Sho Kosugi of ISH -p.tiddy-'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    -dallas, texas-
    Posts
    11,183

    Default Re: NFL Re-Draft By Gil Brandt

    Murray is already the leading rushing rookie RB though...only 2 games in.

    IMO it is enough to say he is better than Ingram

    yeah, the Ram's run-D sucks...but Ingram isn't going 250 on them...no way

  4. #4
    Serious playground baller
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    San Francisco
    Posts
    488

    Default Re: NFL Re-Draft By Gil Brandt

    Daniel Thomas projects to be a much better RB over the long haul IMO.

  5. #5
    the Sho Kosugi of ISH -p.tiddy-'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    -dallas, texas-
    Posts
    11,183

    Default Re: NFL Re-Draft By Gil Brandt

    Quote Originally Posted by Playmakers Dad
    Daniel Thomas projects to be a much better RB over the long haul IMO.
    "much better" ?

    explain please...

    that guy hasn't done anything

  6. #6
    NBA lottery pick
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    TX
    Posts
    5,706

    Default Re: NFL Re-Draft By Gil Brandt

    This is so stupid. You don't do these draft re-do's until a couple of years later, not midway thru the season.

  7. #7
    Serious playground baller
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    San Francisco
    Posts
    488

    Default Re: NFL Re-Draft By Gil Brandt

    Quote Originally Posted by -p.tiddy-
    "much better" ?

    explain please...

    that guy hasn't done anything
    this is why you rub people the wrong way a lot. i doubt you've watched daniel thomas play one game in the nfl or college. you just blindly back the guys you follow to point of being obnoxious.

    and aside from ripping 250 yards vs the rams what has demarco done?

    for the record daniel thomas is a tougher runner, has better vision, absorbs contact better, picks up tough yards, and definitely projects to be a more effective inside/goal line runner.

    i don't see a big difference between felix and demarco.

    i'll make a 200 dollar bet with you demarco gets held under 70 yards rushing vs Seattle?

  8. #8
    NBA lottery pick
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    TX
    Posts
    5,706

    Default Re: NFL Re-Draft By Gil Brandt

    Quote Originally Posted by Playmakers Dad
    this is why you rub people the wrong way a lot. i doubt you've watched daniel thomas play one game in the nfl or college. you just blindly back the guys you follow to point of being obnoxious.

    and aside from ripping 250 yards vs the rams what has demarco done?


    for the record daniel thomas is a tougher runner, has better vision, absorbs contact better, picks up tough yards, and definitely projects to be a more effective inside/goal line runner.

    i don't see a big difference between felix and demarco.

    i'll make a 200 dollar bet with you demarco gets held under 70 yards rushing vs Seattle?
    Exactly.

  9. #9
    the Sho Kosugi of ISH -p.tiddy-'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    -dallas, texas-
    Posts
    11,183

    Default Re: NFL Re-Draft By Gil Brandt

    Quote Originally Posted by Playmakers Dad
    this is why you rub people the wrong way a lot. i doubt you've watched daniel thomas play one game in the nfl or college. you just blindly back the guys you follow to point of being obnoxious.

    and aside from ripping 250 yards vs the rams what has demarco done?

    for the record daniel thomas is a tougher runner, has better vision, absorbs contact better, picks up tough yards, and definitely projects to be a more effective inside/goal line runner.

    i don't see a big difference between felix and demarco.

    i'll make a 200 dollar bet with you demarco gets held under 70 yards rushing vs Seattle?
    it was a question dude, how did you get me being overly obnoxious from that wtf???


    let me think about that bet though...hold up, gotta see if I can find anything on Felix

  10. #10
    the Sho Kosugi of ISH -p.tiddy-'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    -dallas, texas-
    Posts
    11,183

    Default Re: NFL Re-Draft By Gil Brandt

    Demarco would have had near 200 in Philly btw had we been on the feild more than 18 minutes...

  11. #11
    Serious playground baller
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    San Francisco
    Posts
    488

    Default Re: NFL Re-Draft By Gil Brandt

    Quote Originally Posted by -p.tiddy-
    it was a question dude, how did you get me being overly obnoxious from that wtf???


    let me think about that bet though...hold up, gotta see if I can find anything on Felix
    felix is not playing.

    if felix plays the bet will be negated. im saying demarco won't rush for 70 yards vs the lowly seahawks as the feature back.

  12. #12
    Sixers|Eagles|Phillies GOBB's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Illadelph live 215
    Posts
    47,305

    Default Re: NFL Re-Draft By Gil Brandt

    Look at primetime weasel out. Watch him out up bs requests "I'll take the bet if Murray gets atleast 20 carries and if romo passes more than 30 times it's off"

  13. #13
    the Sho Kosugi of ISH -p.tiddy-'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    -dallas, texas-
    Posts
    11,183

    Default Re: NFL Re-Draft By Gil Brandt

    Quote Originally Posted by Playmakers Dad
    felix is not playing.

    if felix plays the bet will be negated. im saying demarco won't rush for 70 yards vs the lowly seahawks as the feature back.
    $100...65 yards, and you have yourself a deal

  14. #14
    the Sho Kosugi of ISH -p.tiddy-'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    -dallas, texas-
    Posts
    11,183

    Default Re: NFL Re-Draft By Gil Brandt

    or 80 total yards...if you would rather do that

  15. #15
    Serious playground baller
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    San Francisco
    Posts
    488

    Default Re: NFL Re-Draft By Gil Brandt

    Quote Originally Posted by -p.tiddy-
    $100...65 yards, and you have yourself a deal
    dude 70 yards and 200 bucks?

    i thought demarco was a stud, do suds not rush for 70 yards vs the seahawks, rofl.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •