Are Tony Parker and Manu Ginobili hall of famers?

[SacJB Shady]

They have won 3 championships. Do you think they are hall of fame material? Parker has been one of the most accurate finishers in the game.

[cuad]

Manu Ginobili, yes.

[Deuce Bigalow]

Manu - Yes
Parker - eh, maybe

[greymatter]

Not really impressed by either of their careers. Had they both played in the 80s or 90s, neither would have ever come close to sniffing an all-star team and would at best be slightly above average starters.

[AngelEyes]

I think Manu at this point and time is the better hall candidate. In my opinion he made a slightly bigger impact on the Spur dynasty and I find him to be the superior player. Parker does have a surplus of accomplishments and made his imprint on three championship teams but I still think he needs to accomplish a bit more.

[Wonder Bread Kid]

Not really impressed by either of their careers. Had they both played in the 80s or 90s, neither would have ever come close to sniffing an all-star team and would at best be slightly above average starters.

You're a gigantic moron.

Manu has three NBA titles, an Olympic gold medal and countless euro awards.

He's a first ballet HOFer.

Tony, well, you could argue whether or not he'd get it.

[I.R.Beast]

Parker - yes
Manu - no

Tony Parker is vastly underrated around here.... 3 rings..a finals MVP an efficient scorer underrated passer, always one of the better PGs....definately hall of fame material.

[greymatter]

You're a gigantic moron.

Manu has three NBA titles, an Olympic gold medal and countless euro awards.


Tony, well, you could argue whether or not he'd get it.

And you're a little douche.

Duncan was obviously the best player on those title teams. Robert Horry has 7 titles. Christian Laettner has an Olympic gold medal too and Anthony Parker was Euroleague MVP. Big fcuking deal.

Edit: Ah no wonder, a SA homertard.

[Haymaker]

Lesser players are in the HOF, so Tony parker getting voted in would not be a travesty.

[greymatter]

Parker - yes
Manu - no

Tony Parker is vastly underrated around here.... 3 rings..a finals MVP an efficient scorer underrated passer, always one of the better PGs....definately hall of fame material.

Mediocre PG skills, efficient scorer with peak scoring seasons of 18.6, 18.8, 18.9, 22.0, slightly below average to mediocre defender. Nothing really outstanding there.

[Nick Young]

Manu aka third best SG of all time and the clutchest player of his generation, yes. Tony Parker, no.

[I.R.Beast]

Mediocre PG skills, efficient scorer with peak scoring seasons of 18.6, 18.8, 18.9, 22.0, slightly below average to mediocre defender. Nothing really outstanding there.

parker is not a medicore defender...he's better than that. You dont play for Poppavich being a medicore defender. His PG skill are definately above medicore as well. The spurs offense is not predicated on Ball dominant PG play...you clearly know nothing of tony parker.

[kumquat]

Manu should be for sure.

Manu is a guy who's stats don't reflect how much impact he has.

[greymatter]

Manu aka third best SG of all time and the clutchest player of his generation, yes. Tony Parker, no.

Better than DWade, Jerry West, Clyde Drexler, Joe Dumars, Ray Allen? You'd have to be born yesterday or a retard to believe that. Oh wait.

[Haymaker]

Better than DWade, Jerry West, Clyde Drexler, Joe Dumars, Ray Allen? You'd have to be born yesterday or a retard to believe that. Oh wait.

Manu is very very good. I would say on par with Dumars and Ray Allen. Not waaaayy behind DWade, but of course Clyde and West are above him. Clearly not the 3rd best SG.