Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 50
  1. #16
    NBA Superstar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    13,744

    Default Re: Was the 2004 pistons the only team to win a championship without....

    Quote Originally Posted by Tenchi Ryu
    They didn't have a superstar, but they had legit pieces and a closer, thats all you need to win.
    I think there's a lot of ways to build a championship team, but I think it's a very fortunate position to be in when a team finds themselves to be as deep as Detroit was. It seemed as if they had 10 players who all provided something significant. That's not to say they all always performed to their maximum abilities, but a lot of times they did.

    One of my favorite moments watching that team came when Mike James and Lindsey Hunter would come off the bench. Then, as if he was still at Kansas, head coach Larry Brown would call for a half-court trap and James and Hunter would succeed in creating a turnover. It was not something I was accustomed to seeing out of an NBA club.

    As always, I'm glad to see the legacy of this Pistons team live on. They caught an awful lot of flak back then. The low scores often led to charges of Detroit being a boring team. And in truth, I suppose they could have been, for I'm fully aware how teams are never boring when they're your team (and the Pistons were my team). But even then, I still feel like there was a lot of excitement. A lot of that defense came in the way of emphatic blocks or rebounds, leading to a fair share of transition buckets at the other end. Like so: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3zI37g_7OWQ. I wish more full-length 2004 Pistons games were out there. I remember one particular contest against Denver (in Denver) that year where they seemingly had 20 dunks.
    Last edited by Rake2204; 07-06-2012 at 10:55 AM.

  2. #17
    Bitch Hands fsvr54's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    6,017

    Default Re: Was the 2004 pistons the only team to win a championship without....

    It wasn't a one time fluke though, they made it to the conference finals like 6 times in a row and made it to Finals Game 7 in 2005, which they should have won.

  3. #18
    College superstar D.J.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Astoria, NY
    Posts
    4,669

    Default Re: Was the 2004 pistons the only team to win a championship without....

    Ben Wallace averaged over 12 RPG, 3 BPG, and was runner up for DPOY. How is that not top 100???

  4. #19
    NBA Legend and Hall of Famer Xiao Yao You's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Lockwood, Montana, U.S.A.
    Posts
    49,780

    Default Re: Was the 2004 pistons the only team to win a championship without....

    Kobe's top 100 and his selfish play was the main reason they won.

  5. #20
    Lazy Bulls fan Freedom Kid7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Tending the Fire
    Posts
    1,087

    Default Re: Was the 2004 pistons the only team to win a championship without....

    The '04 Pistons were an excellent team that did everything they did due to good coaching, good defense, good role players, and a pretty selfless environment. You could make a case for either Wallace being top 100 though. Both Sheed and Ben were excellent defenders. Ben was by far superior on defense though, and that makes him a top 100 player to most people.

  6. #21
    Banned
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    12,746

    Default Re: Was the 2004 pistons the only team to win a championship without....

    Quote Originally Posted by Punpun
    That's because Ben Wallace is a better player than Mutombo though.


    [COLOR="White"]See what I did there?[/COLOR]

  7. #22
    Head Connoisseur Punpun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Kicking asses since Dec11'
    Posts
    3,439

    Default Re: Was the 2004 pistons the only team to win a championship without....

    Don't use the Finger wave Ibaka uses on me bitch. Don't test me.

  8. #23
    I am your soldier!
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    In the year 2525
    Posts
    6,610

    Default Re: Was the 2004 pistons the only team to win a championship without....

    Quote Originally Posted by Punpun
    That's enough.


    Dikembe Mutombo from age 25-35, 1991-1992 - 2001-2002

    840 / 870 games. Played in 96.6% of games, starting all of them.

    11 season average:
    12.4 ppg / 12.3 reb / 3.4 blk / 1.4 ast / .5 stl / 2.3 to
    52.2% fg / 67.9% ft
    ----------------------------
    Playoffs:
    66 games - 28 wins / 38 losses

    12.7 ppg / 12.6 reb / 3.3 blk / 1 ast / .5 stl / 2 to
    51.5% fg / 69.9% ft
    -----------------------------
    8 time all-star
    4 time DPOY
    NBA all rookie team
    6 all-defense (1stx3 2ndx3)
    3 all-nba (2ndx1 3rdx2)
    4 years grabbing the most rebounds in the league
    5 years blocking the most shots in the league
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Ben Wallace from age 25-32, 1999-2000 - 2006-2007

    628 / 656 games. Played 95.7% of games, starting all of them.

    8 season average:
    7.3 ppg / 12 reb / 2.5 blk / 1.6 ast / 1.5 stl / 1.2 to
    47.4% fg / 42.6% ft
    ---------------------------
    Playoffs:
    103 games - 59 wins / 44 losses

    8.6 pts / 12.9 reb / 2.3 blk / 1.5 ast / 1.8 stl / 1.2 to
    47.8% fg / 42.6% ft
    ----------------------------
    4 time all-star
    4 time DPOY
    6 all-defense (1stx5 2ndx1)
    5 all-nba (2ndx3 3rdx2)
    2 years grabbing the most rebounds in the league
    1 year blocking the most shots in the league
    - Mutombo came into the league as a lottery pick, instantly helping his team.
    - Wallace was undrafted, and couldn't get off of the bench for 3 years.
    - Mutombo put up better numbers, over a longer period of time, during a tougher era for centers.

    Mutombo > Ben Wallace

  9. #24
    Head Connoisseur Punpun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Kicking asses since Dec11'
    Posts
    3,439

    Default Re: Was the 2004 pistons the only team to win a championship without....

    And Ben was the pillar of the best Defensive team of all time.

  10. #25
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    4,932

    Default Re: Was the 2004 pistons the only team to win a championship without....

    Ben Wallace is a top 100 player.

    Quote Originally Posted by ProfessorMurder
    Literally the only thing Wallace did that Mutombo didn't do (or do better) was win 1 championship.
    Wallace was the better overall defender. Wallace was the better pick and roll defender while Mutombo was the better post defender. They were about dead even when it came to shot blocking but I would give the edge to Wallace due to superior athleticism.

    It's close though, Mutombo is better overall probably because he was an above average offensive player while Wallace was just average to above average.

  11. #26
    Mohamed Bamba IGotACoolStory's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    3,362

    Default Re: Was the 2004 pistons the only team to win a championship without....

    Quote Originally Posted by Punpun
    And Ben was the pillar of the best Defensive team of all time.
    Not even the best defensive team in Pistons history.

  12. #27
    Not airballing my layups anymore
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    120

    Default Re: Was the 2004 pistons the only team to win a championship without....

    Most people don't realize that Ben Wallace is only 6 feet 9 inches.

  13. #28
    Raz
    Fan in the Stands (unregistered)

    Default Re: Was the 2004 pistons the only team to win a championship without....

    Quote Originally Posted by Rake2204
    I think there's a lot of ways to build a championship team, but I think it's a very fortunate position to be in when a team finds themselves to be as deep as Detroit was. It seemed as if they had 10 players who all provided something significant. That's not to say they all always performed to their maximum abilities, but a lot of times they did.

    One of my favorite moments watching that team came when Mike James and Lindsey Hunter would come off the bench. Then, as if he was still at Kansas, [COLOR="Red"]head coach Mike Brown[/COLOR] would call for a half-court trap and James and Hunter would succeed in creating a turnover. It was not something I was accustomed to seeing out of an NBA club.

    As always, I'm glad to see the legacy of this Pistons team live on. They caught an awful lot of flak back then. The low scores often led to charges of Detroit being a boring team. And in truth, I suppose they could have been, for I'm fully aware how teams are never boring when they're your team (and the Pistons were my team). But even then, I still feel like there was a lot of excitement. A lot of that defense came in the way of emphatic blocks or rebounds, leading to a fair share of transition buckets at the other end. Like so: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3zI37g_7OWQ. I wish more full-length 2004 Pistons games were out there. I remember one particular contest against Denver (in Denver) that year where they seemingly had 20 dunks.


  14. #29
    Raz
    Fan in the Stands (unregistered)

    Default Re: Was the 2004 pistons the only team to win a championship without....

    Quote Originally Posted by mrbigshot1
    Most people don't realize that Ben Wallace is only 6 feet 9 inches of terror.
    Fixed

  15. #30
    Head Connoisseur Punpun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Kicking asses since Dec11'
    Posts
    3,439

    Default Re: Was the 2004 pistons the only team to win a championship without....

    Quote Originally Posted by IGotACoolStory
    Not even the best defensive team in Pistons history.
    They played Real Defense. Not the "Bad boys" bullshit where they played dirty in order to hide their shortcomings on Defense.


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •