Tim Duncan vs Kobe Bryant - Year by Year since 1998

[kennethgriffin]

PER is the Absolut Broken Down Stats of Dominance and Efficiency There is a a Reason Why Wilt, Kareem, DR J (ABA era) and MJ Had the Highest During Their Generations. It is Definetly Not a Coincidence. It Tells Us the Truth of What Happened Per Game of Dominant and Efficiency.

Kobe has been Better than Duncan since around 08-2012 basically because Duncan`s Prime Has Been Over Till About 08.

Duncan > Bryant.

charles barkley is an absolute broken down tub of fat and efficiently ate his way to the point where there was no reason to stay with 1 team, but instead ring chase and fail like he has at everything in his life..

[Round Mound]

charles barkley is an absolute broken down tub of fat and efficiently ate his way to the point where there was no reason to stay with 1 team, but instead ring chase and fail like he has at everything in his life..

What does Barkley have to do with the thread DUMB KID?

I Give You Statistical Evidence NOT RAW STATS, LIKES, VOTES, MEDIA etc of Crap....Plain Truth.

Duncan Was A More Dominant and Efficient Player than Kobe. PERIOD!

PD: Barkley was donde 1995 onwards so it was a good move to go to Houston as a "Role Player" The ERA that Barkley Played in Was Dominated by Great Teams Not Individuals

[BlackVVaves]

PER is the Absolut Broken Down Stat of Dominance and Efficiency There is a a Reason Why Wilt, Kareem, DR J (ABA era) and MJ Had the Highest During Their Generations. It is Definetly Not a Coincidence. It Tells Us the Truth of What Happened Per Game of Dominance and Efficiency.... NOT WHAT WE OR THE MEDIA PREFERS OR LIKES MORE.

Kobe has been Better than Duncan since around 08-12 basically because Duncan`s Prime Has Been Over Froml About 08 Onwards

Duncan > Bryant.

Duncan averaged 20, 10, and 3 in 2006 with a PER of 23.

Kobe averaged 35, 5, and 5 in 2006 with a PER of 28.

Duncan averaged 19, 11, and 3 in 2007 with a PER of 26.

Kobe averaged 32, 6, and 5 in 2007 with a PER of 26


Ether. That shit that makes your soul burn.

Now get the **** outta this thread you poser

[kennethgriffin]

What does Barkley have to do with the thread DUMB KID?

I Give You Statistical Evidence NOT RAW STATS, LIKES, VOTES, MEDIA etc of Crap....Plain Truth.

Duncan Was A More Dominant and Efficient Player than Kobe. PERIOD!

PD: Barkley was donde 1995 onwards so it was a good move to go to Houston as a "Role Player" The ERA that Barkley Played in Was Dominated by Great Teams Not Individuals

[che guevara]

'98-'05: Duncan

'06-present: Kobe

Pretty simple, though I could see an argument for Duncan in '07.

[DatAsh]

1998 - Duncan
1999 - Duncan
2000 - Duncan
2001 - Duncan
2002 - Duncan
2003 - Duncan
2004 - Duncan
2005 - Duncan
2006 - Kobe
2007 - Duncan
2008 - Kobe
2009 - Kobe
2010 - Kobe
2011 - Kobe
2012 - Kobe

That's the correct answer.

[kennethgriffin]

1998 - Duncan
1999 - Duncan
2000 - Duncan
2001 - Duncan
2002 - Duncan
2003 - Duncan
2004 - Duncan
2005 - Duncan
2006 - Kobe
2007 - Duncan
2008 - Kobe
2009 - Kobe
2010 - Kobe
2011 - Kobe
2012 - Kobe

That's the correct answer.

duncan won the title in 2007.. yea... but common man

tony parker was the clear cut best player on the spurs. duncan started declining after 2005. kobe hit his prime in 2006... theres no comparrison

[WockaVodka]

That's the correct answer.

Even though I agree with your list, comparisons and ranking is purely opinion especially when it is close. No right or wrong answer here.

[Deuce Bigalow]

1998 - Duncan
1999 - Duncan
2000 - Duncan
2001 - Kobe
2002 - Kobe
2003 - Duncan
2004 - Duncan
2005 - Duncan
2006 - Kobe
2007 - Kobe
2008 - Kobe
2009 - Kobe
2010 - Kobe
2011 - Kobe
2012 - Kobe

Kobe will be better in 2013 and 2014 as well and longer as long as both are in the league.

[WockaVodka]

1998 - Duncan
1999 - Duncan
2000 - Duncan
2001 - Kobe
2002 - Kobe
2003 - Duncan
2004 - Duncan
2005 - Duncan
2006 - Kobe
2007 - Kobe
2008 - Kobe
2009 - Kobe
2010 - Kobe
2011 - Kobe
2012 - Kobe

I have a hard time believing anyone could make a reasonable argument that Kobe was better than Duncan in 2002. Duncan was at his absolute peak that season and he was named the MVP that season.

[SuperPippen]

1998 - Duncan
1999 - Duncan
2000 - Duncan
2001 - Kobe
2002 - Kobe
2003 - Duncan
2004 - Duncan
2005 - Duncan
2006 - Kobe
2007 - Kobe
2008 - Kobe
2009 - Kobe
2010 - Kobe
2011 - Kobe
2012 - Kobe

Kobe will be better in 2013 and 2014 as well and longer as long as both are in the league.

There is absolutely no reason to rank Kobe over Duncan in '02. In '01, you could say Kobe was better, and I would agree with you, but certainly not in '02.

[DatAsh]

Even though I agree with your list, comparisons and ranking is purely opinion especially when it is close. No right or wrong answer here.

I know, I was just trying to add a bit of "punch"

[Round Mound]

Duncan averaged 20, 10, and 3 in 2006 with a PER of 23.

Kobe averaged 35, 5, and 5 in 2006 with a PER of 28.

Duncan averaged 19, 11, and 3 in 2007 with a PER of 26.

Kobe averaged 32, 6, and 5 in 2007 with a PER of 26


Ether. That shit that makes your soul burn.

Now get the **** outta this thread you poser

Got Look at Play-Off PER

[Deuce Bigalow]

I gave Kobe 2002 because he dominated the Spurs in the 4th Quarter in the Playoffs while Duncan choked

[WockaVodka]

I gave Kobe 2002 because he dominated the Spurs in the 4th Quarter in the Playoffs while Duncan choked

So 1 quarter of a 4-7 game series is why he was better than someone that made much more of an overall impact and made much more of an overall impact in all other 80+ games?