9/11 Documentary (2012)

[tontoz]

^^ great stuff there. The conspiracy nuts won't touch that.

[andgar923]

Tallest building ever felled with "Controlled Demolition" is the JL Hudsom Department store in Detroit, some excerpts from the website of the company that brought it down









http://www.controlled-demolition.com/world-records


Look at the prep required for J. L. Hudson Department store at 29 floors 439 feet tall then compare to

WTC 7, 49 floors, 741 feet tall
WTC 1, 110 floors, 1,368 feet tall
WTC 2, 110 floors, 1,362 feet tall

And it was all wired and prepped without a soul taking notice during a few blackouts

http://georgewashington2.blogspot.co...-bombs-in.html

Again….

Not saying that bombs were indeed planted, but to believe that it was absurd or impossible is silly. As I stated before, IF it was a controlled demolition explosives wouldn't have been the only thing used. A full on explosive demolition wouldn't have been needed if there was a plane being crashed into it.

That along with some 'evidence' (?) suggesting that theromite could've been used to aid in the collapse.

But months of prep could've been taken place, around all hours of the day, and people wouldn't have noticed a damn thing.

Another thing… what you posted was years before 9/11. I'm sure techniques and explosives would've improved by then. So the amount of explosives and prep work that was needed in the article you provided wouldn't have been needed perhaps?

[andgar923]

And why are you all dancing around and ignoring Aaron Russo's claims?

[tontoz]

But months of prep could've been taken place, around all hours of the day, and people wouldn't have noticed a damn thing.

Sure it's not like the building had any security. Anyone could come and go as they pleased.

That along with some 'evidence' (?) suggesting that theromite could've been used to aid in the collapse.

FYI thermite doesn't explode it burns in completely random fashion, not very effective for a controlled demolition.

Given that the lower floors were intact while the upper floors were collapsing that begs the question of what good this alleged thermite in the lower floors did.

[Cangri]

Another thing that gets me, how come these nut jobs think that the twin towers were done by controlled demolition? Seriously it doesn't look one bit like it, controlled demolition occurs from the ground up, the twin towers didn't fall like that at all. Can't they see the OBVIOUS differences??

Here's a REAL controlled demolition:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=79sJ1bMR6VQ

Here's the collapse twin towers:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ft2uIYucsXo

Now you don't have to be a rocket scientist to figure out the differences, but of course that's too complicated for the conspiracy morons.

[tontoz]

Another thing that gets me, how come these nut jobs think that the twin towers were done by controlled demolition? Seriously it doesn't look one bit like it, controlled demolition occurs from the ground up, the twin towers didn't fall like that at all. Can't they see the OBVIOUS differences??

Here's a REAL controlled demolition:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=79sJ1bMR6VQ

Here's the collapse twin towers:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ft2uIYucsXo

Now you don't have to be a rocket scientist to figure out the differences, but of course that's too complicated for the conspiracy morons.

That is why they stick to posting vids. They want to avoid discussing the elephants in the room.

[magictricked]

[QUOTE=andgar923]
Another thing

[andgar923]

Sure it's not like the building had any security. Anyone could come and go as they pleased.




FYI thermite doesn't explode it burns in completely random fashion, not very effective for a controlled demolition.

Given that the lower floors were intact while the upper floors were collapsing that begs the question of what good this alleged thermite in the lower floors did.

Because it would've been Al Qaeda members without proper clearance doing this.

As if security would've been impossible to penetrate before 9/11. Shit, security AFTER 9/11 has been breached on a number of occasions with people exposing how much it sucks.

And as everybody that works in any sort of building knows, everybody is always checked for their ID and paper work.

But alas, it aint like there was NO connections between the company running security and military/gov. Or it isn't as if CIA, FBI and other agencies didn't have offices there, that you know

[tontoz]

^^ In other words there is no actual evidence that explosives were used, just a bunch of hypothetical nonsense.

What exactly have we gained by invading Afghanistan?

[KevinNYC]

[QUOTE=andgar923]http://georgewashington2.blogspot.co...-bombs-in.html

Again

[Celtics4ever]

This pic defines some of you guys. Bunch of idiots that look at everything from one perspective and believe everything is a straight fact.

[tontoz]

This pic defines some of you guys. Bunch of idiots that look at everything from one perspective and believe everything is a straight fact.

Coming from someone who doesn't understand english that really hurts.

[Riddler]

What exactly have we gained by invading Afghanistan?

Does anybody want to answer this question?

[KevinNYC]

This pic defines some of you guys. Bunch of idiots that look at everything from one perspective and believe everything is a straight fact.

Why don't you go back to misunderstanding our central bank?

[ZenMaster]

Does anybody want to answer this question?

http://www.thedebate.org/thedebate/afghanistan.asp