-
Out here
Re: ISH, let's get political: Barack or Mitt?
Originally Posted by WesWelkerACL
lol at people saying Gary Johnson and Ron Paul. Shows a severe lack of intellect, because I seriously doubt you'd support them if you really broke down their positions. Ex: No FDA, no FAA.
Just because I support a candidate doesn't mean I support everything they believe.
You show a severe lack of intellect by assuming that I do.
-
Great college starter
Re: ISH, let's get political: Barack or Mitt?
http://www.isidewith.com see who you really side with.
-
Chasing Legends
Re: ISH, let's get political: Barack or Mitt?
Mitt Romney
Lesser of 2 evils
-
Re: ISH, let's get political: Barack or Mitt?
-
Re: ISH, let's get political: Barack or Mitt?
I don't see much of a difference between the two to be honest. Someone could break it down if you like but I doubt you're going to two completely different worlds with one or the other as President.
-
Local High School Star
Re: ISH, let's get political: Barack or Mitt?
Originally Posted by GreatGreg
Gary Johnson. The libertarians have it right.
I 2nd that, him or Ron Paul would do but not Ran Paul.
Hell in fact i wold take Jessie the body over the 2 sell out puppets we have to vote for now.
I say 3rd parties should be allowed. But some would wold send their family death treats just like Ross Parow when he was ahead in votes.
The elections are rigged, just look at the little coverage Ron got, while Gary was completely isolated out of all the media.
-
Re: ISH, let's get political: Barack or Mitt?
Originally Posted by 50inchvertical
I side with Gary Johnson on most issues in the 2012 Presidential Election.
-
Reign of Error
Re: ISH, let's get political: Barack or Mitt?
They are different, and most importantly they'd operate in different contexts.
Romney, while more of a a moderate himself, would have to deal with the Republican base of angry white males. He would soon be perceived as untrustworthy, as he'll have been elected by people whose beliefs he doesn't really share.
He would also be surrounded by more Bush-style neocons.
Finally, lobbyists would regain influence, as would Wall Street.
-
Re: ISH, let's get political: Barack or Mitt?
Originally Posted by Kobe 4 The Win
Mitt Romney
Lesser of 2 evils
Im voting for Obama cos i believe he is the lesser of two evils.
Anyways it doesnt matter I live in a deep red state, and Obama is going to get 270 electoral votes easily.
-
Re: ISH, let's get political: Barack or Mitt?
Originally Posted by MavsSuperFan
Im voting for Obama cos i believe he is the lesser of two evils.
Anyways it doesnt matter I live in a deep red state, and Obama is going to get 270 electoral votes easily.
I wouldn't say he'll get 270 electoral votes easily, but he does have much easier path to those 270 electoral votes than Romney.
-
Local High School Star
Re: ISH, let's get political: Barack or Mitt?
-
Learning to shoot layups
Re: ISH, let's get political: Barack or Mitt?
None of the above, both parties are almost completely bought and controlled by corporate lobby groups. The only thing which is different is that certain economic sectors lean more towards Republicans while other prefer Democrats. It's almost like having an election between Walmart and McDonalds .
-
I usually hit open layups
Re: ISH, let's get political: Barack or Mitt?
-
I hit open 5-foot jumpshots with ease
Re: ISH, let's get political: Barack or Mitt?
-
Reign of Error
Re: ISH, let's get political: Barack or Mitt?
Originally Posted by EasyD
None of the above, both parties are almost completely bought and controlled by corporate lobby groups. The only thing which is different is that certain economic sectors lean more towards Republicans while other prefer Democrats. It's almost like having an election between Walmart and McDonalds .
> Even if that's the case, some lobbies are more harmful than others, so there still is a choice to make.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|