Page 3 of 13 FirstFirst 123456 ... LastLast
Results 31 to 45 of 183
  1. #31
    National High School Star
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    rucker park
    Posts
    2,434

    Default Re: Lance Armstrong is spot on(Re: James PEDs debate)

    lol "baseball more popular than basketball" LOLOLOL

  2. #32
    Please clap. Real Men Wear Green's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Boston, MA
    Posts
    28,760

    Default Re: Lance Armstrong is spot on(Re: James PEDs debate)

    If someone digs up real evidence the media will be all over the NBA. But until then irresponsible speculation can do no more than make some star mad at a reporter. It would be fair to ask the league about tougher testing. But it would be stupid to badger a guy like James with accusations he will deny in the absence of proof. The over-analysis of his jaw line means nothing.

  3. #33
    Please clap. Real Men Wear Green's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Boston, MA
    Posts
    28,760

    Default Re: Lance Armstrong is spot on(Re: James PEDs debate)

    Quote Originally Posted by jzek
    Dude, seriously? Baseball is irrelevant until the playoffs (LOL at 180 regular season games). It's on par with hockey in terms of "popularity". I'd say it's just a few notches above Major League Soccer.

    NFL (by a wide margin) > NBA > MLB == NHL > MLS
    It makes more money. And profit is easily the best measure of popularity.

  4. #34
    NJ Net Fan For Life. wang4three's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    11,773

    Default Re: Lance Armstrong is spot on(Re: James PEDs debate)

    Quote Originally Posted by jzek
    Dude, seriously? Baseball is irrelevant until the playoffs (LOL at 180 regular season games). It's on par with hockey in terms of "popularity". I'd say it's just a few notches above Major League Soccer.

    NFL (by a wide margin) > NBA > MLB == NHL > MLS
    I know I'm on an NBA forum, but the numbers do not support your theory at all. MLB is reporting like 7billion in revenue with 500 million in profit. Meanwhile, the NBA generates 4 billion with million 200 in profit. The numbers are not even comparable. Even with players making more money in the MLB, there is just so much more money in the MLB than the NBA.

    If you look at Forbes top 50 richest sports teams in the World, the NBA doesn't even grace it till #35 with the Lakers. Meanwhile both the Dodgers and the Yankees are in the top 10.

    Also if you look at viewership, the World Series beats the NBA Finals in similar situations. This year, Game 7 of the finals drew a near-record of 18 million viewers. In 2011, Game 7 of the World Series drew over 25 million viewers.

    Baseball is bigger than basketball from a view perspective as well as a money perspective. It's the #2 sports in America, no matter how you look at it.

  5. #35
    National High School Star
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    rucker park
    Posts
    2,434

    Default Re: Lance Armstrong is spot on(Re: James PEDs debate)

    this guy is on roids


    but this guy isnt


    nice logic, ISH

  6. #36
    NJ Net Fan For Life. wang4three's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    11,773

    Default Re: Lance Armstrong is spot on(Re: James PEDs debate)

    Quote Originally Posted by KyrieTheFuture
    I guarantee the only reason they make more is because they literally have twice as many games. I'm sure the ratings for the NBA are much higher
    Numbers do not support your theory. If we look at viewership of each of their playoffs, the MLB wins.

  7. #37
    NBA lottery pick
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    4,937

    Default Re: Lance Armstrong is spot on(Re: James PEDs debate)

    Lance is dangerous. He

  8. #38
    sahelanthropus fpliii's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    9,665

    Default Re: Lance Armstrong is spot on(Re: James PEDs debate)

    Quote Originally Posted by wang4three
    Numbers do not support your theory. If we look at viewership of each of their playoffs, the MLB wins.
    Not so sure about that, perhaps you're right though.

    Can someone post the WS/Finals ratings from the last 5 years or so? I can't ATM, but if a little later nobody has, I'll do the research.

  9. #39
    <3 LeBron <3 Heat <3 The Choken One's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    1,570

    Default Re: Lance Armstrong is spot on(Re: James PEDs debate)

    Quote Originally Posted by wang4three
    I know I'm on an NBA forum, but the numbers do not support your theory at all. MLB is reporting like 7billion in revenue with 500 million in profit. Meanwhile, the NBA generates 4 billion with million 200 in profit. The numbers are not even comparable. Even with players making more money in the MLB, there is just so much more money in the MLB than the NBA.

    If you look at Forbes top 50 richest sports teams in the World, the NBA doesn't even grace it till #35 with the Lakers. Meanwhile both the Dodgers and the Yankees are in the top 10.

    Also if you look at viewership, the World Series beats the NBA Finals in similar situations. This year, Game 7 of the finals drew a near-record of 18 million viewers. In 2011, Game 7 of the World Series drew over 25 million viewers.

    Baseball is bigger than basketball from a view perspective as well as a money perspective. It's the #2 sports in America, no matter how you look at it.
    Numbers don't mean much to people on this site.

    If you talk to the casual person, most will say baseball is the better sport. It's to be expected though, we're on a basketball website.

    NFL > MLB > NBA

  10. #40
    Please clap. Real Men Wear Green's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Boston, MA
    Posts
    28,760

    Default Re: Lance Armstrong is spot on(Re: James PEDs debate)

    Quote Originally Posted by unbreakable
    this guy is on roids


    but this guy isnt


    nice logic, ISH
    Failing a test is proof. Big muscles aren't. Do you know anything about PEDs? Look at all the cyclists that have been busted over the years. There isn't a single NFL player skinnier than Lance Armstrong. Does that mean the entirity of football is doping? Your "logic" is stupid.

  11. #41
    NBA lottery pick
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    4,937

    Default Re: Lance Armstrong is spot on(Re: James PEDs debate)

    Btw has this kicked into gear, becaaue Tyson Gay has been busted? Usain Bolt is reaching Armstrong level

  12. #42
    High School Starter mugiwara's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    795

    Default Re: Lance Armstrong is spot on(Re: James PEDs debate)

    Quote Originally Posted by Marchesk
    People are still that naive after Lance? What, is basketball supposed to be a clean sport, unlike MLB? If PEDs help baseball players, track athletes, and cyclists, don't you think they would help basketball players?

    It's weird. We seem to care deeply if someone on the track, the road or the diamond is juicing. We don't seem to care much at all if it's football or basketball.
    specifics

  13. #43
    National High School Star
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    rucker park
    Posts
    2,434

    Default Re: Lance Armstrong is spot on(Re: James PEDs debate)

    Quote Originally Posted by Real Men Wear Green
    Failing a test is proof. Big muscles aren't. Do you know anything about PEDs? Look at all the cyclists that have been busted over the years. There isn't a single NFL player skinnier than Lance Armstrong. Does that mean the entirity of football is doping? Your "logic" is stupid.
    you think guys can train year round playing hoops and still maintain that kinda size/strength/athleticism while playing professional games every 2-3 nights? you sure iz dumb.

    im not ratting out lebron specifically.. theyre all on it.. and its naive young brats like yourself who refuse to see it

  14. #44
    NBA All-star Nash's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    9,088

    Default Re: Lance Armstrong is spot on(Re: James PEDs debate)

    Difference between Lebron and Armstrong, Bolt, Tyson Gay and the rest of those who cheated were guys who came outta nowhere and started performing at a level nobody ever expected them to be. Lebron on the other hand has been a prodigy and an athletic freak since he was 16.

  15. #45
    National High School Star
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    rucker park
    Posts
    2,434

    Default Re: Lance Armstrong is spot on(Re: James PEDs debate)

    [QUOTE=R.I.P.]Btw has this kicked into gear, becaaue Tyson Gay has been busted? Usain Bolt is reaching Armstrong level

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •