81 or 13 in 33 seconds?

[moe94]

Which is more impressive, in your opinion?

[Rake2204]

I prefer 9 in 9: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rhCy8q2p5Jw

[Black and White]

The 81 point game, scoring that many points in the modern era is such a hard thing to do, its a true tribute to one of the best of all time, noone in the modern era has come close.

[moe94]

The 81 point game, scoring that many points in the modern era is such a hard thing to do, its a true tribute to one of the best of all time, noone in the modern era has come close.

Except David Robinson, right?

[Eric Cartman]

The 81 point game, scoring that many points in the modern era is such a hard thing to do, its a true tribute to one of the best of all time, noone in the modern era has come close.

This.

Both are amazing and probably never will happen again.

[Black and White]

Except David Robinson, right?

Well yea, but that was in 94, im talking about 2000 till now, you don't see players going off like that anymore.

[9erempiree]

81 points easily and this isn't a discussion.

[BlackVVaves]

81 points. I'd actually give the 13 points this edge had the 81 points came in a losing effort, but seeing how they spurred a come-from-behind win for the Lakers, who were down big in that game, I'd vote 81.

13 points in 33 seconds though. Amazing feat.

[Droid101]

Kobe's 62 - Mavs 61 through three quarters was almost as impressive as the 81. And both were better than 13 in 35 (which was amazing in and of itself).

[Rake2204]

Actually, I think I'd give the nod to 10 in 45, while erasing a seven point deficit, for a National Championship: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0WzmQmz9Kdc

[9erempiree]

81 points. I'd actually give the 13 points this edge had the 81 points came in a losing effort, but seeing how they spurred a come-from-behind win for the Lakers, who were down big in that game, I'd vote 81.

13 points in 33 seconds though. Amazing feat.

There is no feat with 13 points in 33 seconds.

It was more luck than anything. You know how much a team would have to F up to allow this?

You can insert any great SG in place of Tmac with the same luck and scenario, they would probably score 13 in 33 seconds but nobody can say the same about 81 points.

It can't be that impressive when scrubs can do it, as shown from 9 in 9 seconds and that college game.

[moe94]

81 points easily and this isn't a discussion.

Let's make it a discussion.

I'm playing devil's advovate here, as I also believe 81 is better.

Spurs > Raptors
one man come back > being force fed the ball
If T-Mac felt like it, given the pace he was on, he would have scored well over 1000 points

[COLOR="White"]don't take that last one serious[/COLOR]

[Xsatyr]

13 in 33 was more exciting to watch but 81 is more impressive.

[zoom17]

There is no feat with 13 points in 33 seconds.

It was more luck than anything. You know how much a team would have to F up to allow this?

You can insert any great SG in place of Tmac with the same luck and scenario, they would probably score 13 in 33 seconds but nobody can say the same about 81 points.

Doesn't that make more impressive that the odds of 13 in 33 secs are little to none while kobe had an entire 48 minutes to get 81 plus he was the only good player for the lakers at the time 81 points was impressive though

[Black and White]

Let's make it a discussion.

I'm playing devil's advovate here, as I also believe 81 is better.

Spurs > Raptors
one man come back > being force fed the ball
If T-Mac felt like it, given the pace he was on, he would have scored well over 1000 points

[COLOR="White"]don't take that last one serious[/COLOR]

I can see where you are coming from but 9 times out of 10 that spurs team doesn't screw up that bad to allow T-Mac to do it, it was a pretty lucky situation.