Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 47
  1. #16
    Raps Sakkreth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Kaunas, Lithuania
    Posts
    4,573

    Default Re: 81 or 13 in 33 seconds?

    I'd rank Kobe's 61 in 3 quarters above his 81, 81 was against a bad team, and with 61 he outscored Mavs by himself.
    Last edited by Sakkreth; 12-15-2013 at 08:06 PM.

  2. #17
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Toronto
    Posts
    9,693

    Default Re: 81 or 13 in 33 seconds?

    Quote Originally Posted by Black and White
    I can see where you are coming from but 9 times out of 10 that spurs team doesn't screw up that bad to allow T-Mac to do it, it was a pretty lucky situation.
    I bet you Iverson or T-Mac could have replicated the 81 if given similar circumstances.

  3. #18
    shhhhhhh
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Downtown Hoops Dojo
    Posts
    28,486

    Default Re: 81 or 13 in 33 seconds?

    81.. You now how hard it is to lull a defense into a false sense of security for 48 minutes

  4. #19
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    California of America
    Posts
    18,104

    Default Re: 81 or 13 in 33 seconds?

    Quote Originally Posted by moe94
    I bet you Iverson or T-Mac could have replicated the 81 if given similar circumstances.
    They were given the same circumstance for their entire career and can't do it.

    Both great scorers for their bad teams and I'm sure both of them had been down by double digit points at halftime and had the chance to do it, they just can't.

    They both played Toronto that year too.

  5. #20
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    TD Garden
    Posts
    7,443

    Default Re: 81 or 13 in 33 seconds?

    Quote Originally Posted by moe94
    I bet you Iverson or T-Mac could have replicated the 81 if given similar circumstances.
    It would probably be possible maybe, but it didn't happen, i just think the 81 is more impressive, credit where credit is due tho, T-macs performance in that game was clutch as fvck

  6. #21
    Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    7,997

    Default Re: 81 or 13 in 33 seconds?

    Quote Originally Posted by Sakkreth
    I'd rank Kobe's 61 in 3 quarters above his 81, 81 was a loss against a bad team, and with 61 he outscored Mavs by himself.
    Get your facts straight idiot.

  7. #22
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    TD Garden
    Posts
    7,443

    Default Re: 81 or 13 in 33 seconds?

    Quote Originally Posted by Sakkreth
    I'd rank Kobe's 61 in 3 quarters above his 81, 81 was a loss against a bad team, and with 61 he outscored Mavs by himself.

  8. #23
    College star
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    3,953

    Default Re: 81 or 13 in 33 seconds?

    Quote Originally Posted by 9erempiree
    There is no feat with 13 points in 33 seconds.

    It was more luck than anything. You know how much a team would have to F up to allow this?

    You can insert any great SG in place of Tmac with the same luck and scenario, they would probably score 13 in 33 seconds but nobody can say the same about 81 points.

    It can't be that impressive when scrubs can do it, as shown from 9 in 9 seconds and that college game.
    Tell us, when are you going to give up the charade and stop posing as a Kobe troll?

  9. #24
    Kobe Apostle Deuce Bigalow's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    10,606

    Default Re: 81 or 13 in 33 seconds?

    Quote Originally Posted by Sakkreth
    I'd rank Kobe's 61 in 3 quarters above his 81, 81 was a loss against a bad team, and with 61 he outscored Mavs by himself.

  10. #25
    College star
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    3,953

    Default Re: 81 or 13 in 33 seconds?

    Quote Originally Posted by Sakkreth
    I'd rank Kobe's 61 in 3 quarters above his 81, 81 was a loss against a bad team, and with 61 he outscored Mavs by himself.

  11. #26
    Big Booty Hoes!! NumberSix's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    The Internets
    Posts
    27,096

    Default Re: 81 or 13 in 33 seconds?

    Quote Originally Posted by Black and White
    Well yea, but that was in 94, im talking about 2000 till now, you don't see players going off like that anymore.
    When was the last time you saw someone remotely try to?

  12. #27
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Toronto
    Posts
    9,693

    Default Re: 81 or 13 in 33 seconds?

    Raptor fans getting blown out.

  13. #28
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    TD Garden
    Posts
    7,443

    Default Re: 81 or 13 in 33 seconds?

    Quote Originally Posted by NumberSix
    When was the last time you saw someone remotely try to?
    Thats my point, in this era, its such a hard thing to do, given other players on the team etc, the fact that Kobe managed to do it in 2006 should say something (and don't tell me hes a ball hog)

  14. #29
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Toronto
    Posts
    9,693

    Default Re: 81 or 13 in 33 seconds?

    Quote Originally Posted by Black and White
    (and don't tell me hes a ball hog)
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fc_hVKFe_OA

  15. #30
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    TD Garden
    Posts
    7,443

    Default Re: 81 or 13 in 33 seconds?

    Quote Originally Posted by moe94
    He didn't trust his team mates???

    We all know he held the ball too much but what i meant by it was that i wanted something more than just "hes a ball hog" to try and prove a point.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •