-
Raps
Re: 81 or 13 in 33 seconds?
I'd rank Kobe's 61 in 3 quarters above his 81, 81 was against a bad team, and with 61 he outscored Mavs by himself.
Last edited by Sakkreth; 12-15-2013 at 08:06 PM.
-
Re: 81 or 13 in 33 seconds?
Originally Posted by Black and White
I can see where you are coming from but 9 times out of 10 that spurs team doesn't screw up that bad to allow T-Mac to do it, it was a pretty lucky situation.
I bet you Iverson or T-Mac could have replicated the 81 if given similar circumstances.
-
Re: 81 or 13 in 33 seconds?
81.. You now how hard it is to lull a defense into a false sense of security for 48 minutes
-
Re: 81 or 13 in 33 seconds?
Originally Posted by moe94
I bet you Iverson or T-Mac could have replicated the 81 if given similar circumstances.
They were given the same circumstance for their entire career and can't do it.
Both great scorers for their bad teams and I'm sure both of them had been down by double digit points at halftime and had the chance to do it, they just can't.
They both played Toronto that year too.
-
Re: 81 or 13 in 33 seconds?
Originally Posted by moe94
I bet you Iverson or T-Mac could have replicated the 81 if given similar circumstances.
It would probably be possible maybe, but it didn't happen, i just think the 81 is more impressive, credit where credit is due tho, T-macs performance in that game was clutch as fvck
-
Re: 81 or 13 in 33 seconds?
Originally Posted by Sakkreth
I'd rank Kobe's 61 in 3 quarters above his 81, 81 was a loss against a bad team, and with 61 he outscored Mavs by himself.
Get your facts straight idiot.
-
Re: 81 or 13 in 33 seconds?
Originally Posted by Sakkreth
I'd rank Kobe's 61 in 3 quarters above his 81, 81 was a loss against a bad team, and with 61 he outscored Mavs by himself.
-
Re: 81 or 13 in 33 seconds?
Originally Posted by 9erempiree
There is no feat with 13 points in 33 seconds.
It was more luck than anything. You know how much a team would have to F up to allow this?
You can insert any great SG in place of Tmac with the same luck and scenario, they would probably score 13 in 33 seconds but nobody can say the same about 81 points.
It can't be that impressive when scrubs can do it, as shown from 9 in 9 seconds and that college game.
Tell us, when are you going to give up the charade and stop posing as a Kobe troll?
-
Kobe Apostle
Re: 81 or 13 in 33 seconds?
Originally Posted by Sakkreth
I'd rank Kobe's 61 in 3 quarters above his 81, 81 was a loss against a bad team, and with 61 he outscored Mavs by himself.
-
Re: 81 or 13 in 33 seconds?
Originally Posted by Sakkreth
I'd rank Kobe's 61 in 3 quarters above his 81, 81 was a loss against a bad team, and with 61 he outscored Mavs by himself.
-
Big Booty Hoes!!
Re: 81 or 13 in 33 seconds?
Originally Posted by Black and White
Well yea, but that was in 94, im talking about 2000 till now, you don't see players going off like that anymore.
When was the last time you saw someone remotely try to?
-
Re: 81 or 13 in 33 seconds?
Raptor fans getting blown out.
-
Re: 81 or 13 in 33 seconds?
Originally Posted by NumberSix
When was the last time you saw someone remotely try to?
Thats my point, in this era, its such a hard thing to do, given other players on the team etc, the fact that Kobe managed to do it in 2006 should say something (and don't tell me hes a ball hog)
-
Re: 81 or 13 in 33 seconds?
Originally Posted by Black and White
(and don't tell me hes a ball hog)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fc_hVKFe_OA
-
Re: 81 or 13 in 33 seconds?
Originally Posted by moe94
He didn't trust his team mates???
We all know he held the ball too much but what i meant by it was that i wanted something more than just "hes a ball hog" to try and prove a point.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|