-
2nd Greatest Player
-
College star
Re: 1986 Houston Rockets vs. 1996 Chicago Bulls
People gonna just say '72-wins' or whatever but this is actually a pretty good question/battle.
Sampson and Hakeem's size, skill and athleticism would be too much for the Bulls' frontcourt and they were also great at protecting the paint at the other end.
Hakeem was not at his best but already great, and who would guard him? He was the C but I think Rodman would be on him because Sampson was too tall for Dennis and Longley/Wennington would get murdered... On the other hand how could those two hang around with basically a 7'3'' PF? Sampson was really athletic, could handle the ball, pass, rebound, scored inside and even shoot, plus blocked shots, really good player before all the "issues". Rodman could also rough up Sampson, a good strategy.
Houston was not all Hakeem and Ralph though, they had a pretty good all-around SG in Lewis Lloyd, John Lucas, the PG, was a nice baller (injured in the playoffs and also drug problems afterwards), Rodney McCray at SF could play some mean D, also pass and rebound plus some efficient points. They also had a good bench with versatile SF Robert Reid, plus Jim Petersen, Allen Leavell and Mitchell Wiggins.
So yeah, we all know about Chicago but Houston had a great team and the misfortune to face one of the GOAT teams, if not the GOAT team, with peak Bird, in the Finals (plus great potential that went down the toilet pretty much)... I could've definitely see the Rockets winning due to their twin towers against the Bulls.
-
Death Before Dishonor
Re: 1986 Houston Rockets vs. 1996 Chicago Bulls
-
Greatest
Re: 1986 Houston Rockets vs. 1996 Chicago Bulls
Not a bad hypothetical, but Bulls in 6 (maybe 7) nevertheless.
-
College star
Re: 1986 Houston Rockets vs. 1996 Chicago Bulls
Don't forget that this Rockets' team was 11-3 in the playoffs before facing the Celtics in the Finals. They beat the 62-20 record, showtime Lakers (with Kareem, Magic, Worthy, Scott, Mo Lucas, Cooper, Rambis..) 4-1, and they still took Boston to 6, a team better than the 96 Bulls with a more-than-legit PF/C duo (with peak Bird also playing PF and Walton off the bench). All of that without John Lucas, in the post-season.
-
If cops pull up i am
Re: 1986 Houston Rockets vs. 1996 Chicago Bulls
Would go to 7 games. Bulls take it because they have the GOAT.
-
Coach
Re: 1986 Houston Rockets vs. 1996 Chicago Bulls
GOAT gonna GOAT
-
NBA rookie of the year
Re: 1986 Houston Rockets vs. 1996 Chicago Bulls
That 1986 season was crazy competitive: The Rockets won "only" 51 games and yet had the 2nd best record in the West and the 5th in the whole NBA.
As for that series, it's going to be tough. Will probably go to 6 or 7 games, with the Bulls being the favorites due to experience and HCA. As for the most dominant player of the series, it could either be Jordan or Hakeem. Their potential matchups with Reid (though he may guard Pippen) and Rodman would be very interesting.
-
NBA Legend
Re: 1986 Houston Rockets vs. 1996 Chicago Bulls
Originally Posted by Psileas
That 1986 season was crazy competitive: The Rockets won "only" 51 games and yet had the 2nd best record in the West and the 5th in the whole NBA.
As for that series, it's going to be tough. Will probably go to 6 or 7 games, with the Bulls being the favorites due to experience and HCA. As for the most dominant player of the series, it could either be Jordan or Hakeem. Their potential matchups with Reid (though he may guard Pippen) and Rodman would be very interesting.
One thing is almost a certainty... the 95-96 Bulls would not have gone 72-10 in 1986.
-
Re: 1986 Houston Rockets vs. 1996 Chicago Bulls
Originally Posted by LAZERUSS
One thing is almost a certainty... the 95-96 Bulls would not have gone 72-10 in 1986.
What is meant by this?
Bulls taking the place of the '86 Bulls or do they get to play them?
What conference are the new Bulls in? Chicago played in the West up to 1980. But at that point in time the West was larger so the Bulls are likely in the East. Scheduling is important, is my point.
Do the Bulls get the benefit of non-expansion and get to keep BJ Armstrong?
Originally Posted by Psileas
That 1986 season was crazy competitive: The Rockets won "only" 51 games and yet had the 2nd best record in the West and the 5th in the whole NBA.
As for that series, it's going to be tough. Will probably go to 6 or 7 games, with the Bulls being the favorites due to experience and HCA. As for the most dominant player of the series, it could either be Jordan or Hakeem. Their potential matchups with Reid (though he may guard Pippen) and Rodman would be very interesting.
Depends on what you mean by competitive. There was much more competition in the middle of the pack. But there was little competition for elite teams in the West. The Spurs made the playoffs with 35 wins (albeit this is partially because at that time a large proportion of the league made the playoffs). The Lakers were the only team in the Pacific not below .500. So it (the West, at least) was competitve in terms of closeness but maybe not so much insofar as the term indicates quality of play/competition.
As such if you were to drop the '96 Bulls team in as a new west coast franchise (or, since we're dropping in a good team, put them in place of the Lakers), the odds of a 72 win season would be greater than in the superior East.
Anyway to the main question, the twin towers matchup thing has the potential to put a spanner in the works in any given series (as it did versus the Lakers), but on paper the Bulls have to be heavily favoured, especially if they can press a sans-Lucas backcourt.
-
Re: 1986 Houston Rockets vs. 1996 Chicago Bulls
Originally Posted by SamuraiSWISH
GOAT gonna GOAT
Any idea what season/game/play this pic is from?
EDIT: Has to be from 1993 at some point, because that was the only year that Rivers was on the Knicks while MJ was playing.
-
Re: 1986 Houston Rockets vs. 1996 Chicago Bulls
Originally Posted by SamuraiSWISH
GOAT gonna GOAT
That's a pretty nice pic.
-
Re: 1986 Houston Rockets vs. 1996 Chicago Bulls
Originally Posted by OldSchoolBBall
Any idea what season/game/play this pic is from?
EDIT: Has to be from 1993 at some point, because that was the only year that Rivers was on the Knicks while MJ was playing.
I was going to say what you just put in the edit (plus the url of the pic calls it '93 and Oakley's 'do ages it to around then too).
My best guess is it's from the playoffs and if so there are a lot of game videos and highlights if you really want to search for it. NY are in white (i.e. home) so that narrows it down (game one, two or five, if it is indeed playoffs).
-
Coach
Re: 1986 Houston Rockets vs. 1996 Chicago Bulls
Originally Posted by OldSchoolBBall
Any idea what season/game/play this pic is from?
EDIT: Has to be from 1993 at some point, because that was the only year that Rivers was on the Knicks while MJ was playing.
It's from the '93 ECF. Notice the small wristband on MJ's shooting wrist. He wore that when he had wrist problems 2x times in his career. In the '93 playoffs, and a portion of the '98 season. And I think some of his tenure in Washington.
-
NBA Superstar
Re: 1986 Houston Rockets vs. 1996 Chicago Bulls
The 96 Bulls woukd destroy that Rocket team
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|