Grant Hill or Paul George

[Shade8780]

I didnt get to see Hill play but I heard he was very good and Ive seen his stats. PG has arguably been a top 3 player in the league this year though. Who's better?

[Lebron23]

Give me Grant Hill. But PG right now have the better team success than GH.

[plowking]

Penny Hardaway was another player in the similar mold as these two, and he was better than both.

[Alan Ogg]

Prime Grant Hill

21.5 ppg, 9 reb, 7 ast, 2 stl

[AintNoSunshine]

Even worse comparison than your other thread. Grant Hill was better.

[crunk-juice]

Prime Grant Hill

21.5 ppg, 9 reb, 7 ast, 2 stl

Pre-prime Paul George

24 ppg, 6 reb, 3.6 ast, 2 stl



not exactly sure who you were making a case for

[Shade8780]

Scary af that George is only 23 and is playing at this level.

[Alan Ogg]

Pre-prime Paul George

24 ppg, 6 reb, 3.6 ast, 2 stl



not exactly sure who you were making a case for

I'm picking Grant Hill. Not sure he even reached his peak. Before getting injured he put up

26 ppg, 6.5 reb, 5 ast, 1.5 stl

[poido123]

Grant Hill was a force man.

What Lebron was projected to be now, was what Grant Hill was supposed to be.

He could shoot, pass, rebound and do it all.

Before he got injured, he was on par with current Lebron minus the accolades.

Here's a few videos for guys who didn't see him much, first video is the best IMO:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VEeYFH-qlvk

http://cdn.tss.uproxx.com/TSS/wp-con.../Boots-Guy.jpg



So if you think that Lebron is better than George(you should), then Hill was better in his prime.

[pauk]

Prime Grant Hill, he was essentially being the Lebron before Lebron before he got injured.

[East_Stone_Ya]

it's Grant Hill and btw it's a bad comparison

[crunk-juice]

I'm picking Grant Hill. Not sure he even reached his peak. Before getting injured he put up

26 ppg, 6.5 reb, 5 ast, 1.5 stl

see that's the thing, it depends on what Hill we are supposed to be considering.

I would never argue the George projects better than Hill projected. he was on his way to maybe being one of the best to play the game. Hill's years in Detroit were special.

[plowking]

Hill didn't reach his peak? Rubbish. He was 28 when he got injured. The majority of perimeter players have already had their best season by then. He wasn't getting much better either way.

Not to mention he wasn't great on the defensive side of the ball. Penny Hardaway could do everything Hill could do, and better. He was better offensively, a better passer, slightly worse rebounder, and a far better defender.

[crunk-juice]

Hill didn't reach his peak? Rubbish. He was 28 when he got injured. The majority of perimeter players have already had their best season by then. He wasn't getting much better either way.

Not to mention he wasn't great on the defensive side of the ball. Penny Hardaway could do everything Hill could do, and better. He was better offensively, a better passer, slightly worse rebounder, and a far better defender.

'slightly' worse rebounder? come on now.

[poido123]

Hill didn't reach his peak? Rubbish. He was 28 when he got injured. The majority of perimeter players have already had their best season by then. He wasn't getting much better either way.

Not to mention he wasn't great on the defensive side of the ball. Penny Hardaway could do everything Hill could do, and better. He was better offensively, a better passer, slightly worse rebounder, and a far better defender.

Hill was near on lebron's level now. I'm not kidding.

This thread should be Grant Hill v Lebron James as they were much more similar players.

Hill didn't have Shaq to distract opposing defenses like Penny did. Hill was a better player

You're wrong again about a player comparison, just like you were with Bosh v Rodman