Replace your starting PG w/ Ricky Rubio, does your team improve?

[CelticBaller]

Pacers:

Its hard to say. Rubio may be better than Hill on the offensive end, but will be a liability on defense

Rubio is an excellent defender, he is a horrible shooter though

[dr.hee]

Mavs...don't think so. Calderon just fits better. 12/5 in 30 minutes while shooting 48/48/89...subpar defense, but the perfect fit next to Monta offensively. Underrated player imo.

[loganwadams]

hell no

[alenleomessi]

Pacers:

Its hard to say. Rubio may be better than Hill on the offensive end, but will be a liability on defense

just another poster who has no idea what he is talking about

[Johnny Jones]

No

[Black and White]

No

[scott0326]

Wizards? Hell no

[Scholar]

Some of you guys might want to actually mention what your team is. I can't tell based on your avy or location.

[Dro]

Pacers:

Its hard to say. Rubio may be better than Hill on the offensive end, but will be a liability on defense

Pacers do NOT need Rubio....They need a shooter, defender, complimentary player at the point which they have in Hill....

[K Xerxes]

Yea but we need to tank so I'll pass.

Pacers do NOT need Rubio....They need a shooter, defender, complimentary player at the point which they have in Hill....

Pacers need someone who can throw entry passes and doesn't turn the ball over under pressure. That's it.

[Mass Debator]

Pacers do NOT need Rubio....They need a shooter, defender, complimentary player at the point which they have in Hill....

Great defender isn't a must as much as great shooter and passer. Ball handling is a given.

[NuggetsFan]

Nope.

[truhooper]

hell no

[atljonesbro]

Pacers:

Its hard to say. Rubio may be better than Hill on the offensive end, but will be a liability on defense

Are you stupid?

[FatComputerNerd]

Nah.

Kyrie > Rubio, regardless of his slow start to the season.

I also don't think we have enough good scorers outside of Kyrie for Rubio to be a good fit here.