-
Re: Vince Carter and Tracy McGrady; Are they HOF worthy?
Originally Posted by SexSymbol
It's hard to put T-Mac's peak on a shitty team up there with Kobe's, when Kobe had a better year then T-mac had while he was peaking.
03 T-Mac > 03 Kobe
-
Re: Vince Carter and Tracy McGrady; Are they HOF worthy?
Originally Posted by moe94
03 T-Mac > 03 Kobe
-
Re: Vince Carter and Tracy McGrady; Are they HOF worthy?
kobe bryant 2002-2003:
30.3/6.6/5.1/2.1/0.7
http://www.hoopsstats.com/basketball...file/03/12/182
tracy mcgrady 2002-2003:
32.1/6.5/5.5/1.7/0.7
http://www.basketball-reference.com/...mcgratr01.html
but...03 t-mac > kobe?
Last edited by PsychoBe; 02-16-2014 at 01:12 PM.
-
Re: Vince Carter and Tracy McGrady; Are they HOF worthy?
-
-
Re: Vince Carter and Tracy McGrady; Are they HOF worthy?
good thing i cite my sources.
-
Re: Vince Carter and Tracy McGrady; Are they HOF worthy?
What does that even mean, dummy? Are you implying a single person on this site is unaware of that place? Really?
You're still going to suggest he had a better season? Really? I mean, when you got agendas, you got agendas but have some humility. 03 T-Mac is better, offensively. No shame in that. You're treating this like it's some controversial issue when it was a real debate back then. Stop being silly.
-
Re: Vince Carter and Tracy McGrady; Are they HOF worthy?
Originally Posted by moe94
What does that even mean, dummy? Are you implying a single person on this site is unaware of that place? Really?
You're still going to suggest he had a better season? Really? I mean, when you got agendas, you got agendas but have some humility. 03 T-Mac is better, offensively. No shame in that. You're treating this like it's some controversial issue when it was a real debate back then. Stop being silly.
i said that because i was corrected. that's why i changed it.
you made a bold assertion that 03 t-mac was indisputably better than 03 kobe, but when i put the numbers in front of you, now it's a debate.
i'm not knocking t-mac for anything, but nobody is going to give him a hof berth just because he "peaked higher than kobe".
at the end of the day t-mac doesn't necessarily have much of a lasting legacy, but years down the line revisionist history may allow him to sneak his way into the hof. it happened for bernard king so it could happen for him.
-
Re: Vince Carter and Tracy McGrady; Are they HOF worthy?
Originally Posted by moe94
What does that even mean, dummy? Are you implying a single person on this site is unaware of that place? Really?
You're still going to suggest he had a better season? Really? I mean, when you got agendas, you got agendas but have some humility. 03 T-Mac is better, offensively. No shame in that. You're treating this like it's some controversial issue when it was a real debate back then. Stop being silly.
03 Kobe>>>>>>any T-Mac defensively
-
Re: Vince Carter and Tracy McGrady; Are they HOF worthy?
That is true. Goes without saying.^
It was always a debate because it's a damn opinion. You're grasping now. If I say x is better than y, it's always a subjective statement, thus always up for debate.
-
Re: Vince Carter and Tracy McGrady; Are they HOF worthy?
Originally Posted by moe94
That is true. Goes without saying.^
It was always a debate because it's a damn opinion. You're grasping now. If I say x is better than y, it's always a subjective statement, thus always up for debate.
i was being facetious and i know you were too, unfortunately not everyone is as intelligent as you are so i had to do everyone a favor and post the numbers before the "if t-mac was with shaq" arguments and non-sense starts flailing around, as if t-mac didn't have a good thing with vince already before literally forcing his way out of toronto.
-
Re: Vince Carter and Tracy McGrady; Are they HOF worthy?
Not an argument you want to explore while defending Kobe doe
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|