-
Whap'em
World War 3
You think you'll be around to see it?
-
Re: World War 3
Yep. England will improve their record to 3-0 in World Wars.
-
NBA Superstar
Re: World War 3
There was a bulgarian prophet called vanga, she claimed that the last president of the USA will be black
-
Tell me what I Ced
Re: World War 3
Originally Posted by ZenMaster
You think you'll be around to see it?
We're in it now. It's just played with finances instead. I swear, all western countries should stop allowing so many Chinese in. I swear those mother ****ers have some splinter cell shit going on
-
Re: World War 3
Originally Posted by RagaZ
Yep. England will improve their record to 3-0 in World Wars.
ya but at this point you would be a role player. You won the second one as the sidekick too.
-
NBA sixth man of the year
Re: World War 3
I think I can hang on another couple months.
-
Dunking on everybody in the park
Re: World War 3
the days of large scale, international conflict and warfare are over. wars will be fought economically and politically with small scale shows of force.
-
Re: World War 3
Originally Posted by MavsSuperFan
ya but at this point you would be a role player. You won the second one as the sidekick too.
They were also a sidekick to the Iraq and Afghan Wars. Not to mention we had to save their azzes from the Germans in WWI and again in WWII except we called the Germans Nazis. And who can forget the War of 1812 and the Revolutionary War where we kicked dem damn Redcoats ass.
America 6 Britain 0.
-
celtics fan
Re: World War 3
Originally Posted by The Iron Sheik
the days of large scale, international conflict and warfare are over. wars will be fought economically and politically with small scale shows of force.
agreed. dont forget about cyber warfare too.
-
Re: World War 3
Originally Posted by LoPro4u2c
They were also a sidekick to the Iraq and Afghan Wars. Not to mention we had to save their azzes from the Germans in WWI and again in WWII except we called the Germans Nazis. And who can forget the War of 1812 and the Revolutionary War where we kicked dem damn Redcoats ass.
America 6 Britain 0.
They were also a sidekick to the Iraq and Afghan Wars.
Not really. Sidekick implies a significant contribution. They are the sidekick in WW2. more of a role player in Iraq and afghanistan at best.
Not to mention we had to save their azzes from the Germans in WWI
Nah, they would of won without us. They were still the star then.
and again in WWII except we called the Germans Nazis.
True
And who can forget the War of 1812
At best for america it was an indecisive war. we arguably lost. Also the british were far more concerned with fighting the napoleonic wars. We fought a token british force and arguably lost. Their best troops were saved to fight napoleon
the Revolutionary War where we kicked dem damn Redcoats ass.
More accurately we weren't important enough to expend the resources to retain. A small fraction of the british empire was used to fight us. The british were more concerned with their other colonies that produced profits for them.
Also they though we would collapse and eventually come back to the fold.
-
Game. Set. Match.
Re: World War 3
Britain still owns the U.S. in the form of the Federal Reserve.
World War 3 won't last long, as the U.S. has already shown it's willing to target innocent civilians with nuclear warfare.
-
NBA lottery pick
Re: World War 3
Originally Posted by LoPro4u2c
They were also a sidekick to the Iraq and Afghan Wars. Not to mention we had to save their azzes from the Germans in WWI and again in WWII except we called the Germans Nazis. And who can forget the War of 1812 and the Revolutionary War where we kicked dem damn Redcoats ass.
America 6 Britain 0.
Well you lost against the New York Knicks of Wars. Vietnam. Old Country, but their only success came in the 70s against a stacked team of the west. Now they're only good for selling textiles.
-
877-954-1893
Re: World War 3
Originally Posted by MavsSuperFan
Not really. Sidekick implies a significant contribution. They are the sidekick in WW2. more of a role player in Iraq and afghanistan at best.
Nah, they would of won without us. They were still the star then.
True
At best for america it was an indecisive war. we arguably lost. Also the british were far more concerned with fighting the napoleonic wars. We fought a token british force and arguably lost. Their best troops were saved to fight napoleon
More accurately we weren't important enough to expend the resources to retain. A small fraction of the british empire was used to fight us. The british were more concerned with their other colonies that produced profits for them.
Also they though we would collapse and eventually come back to the fold.
That is a bit offensive to say about one of your best allies. The British are one of few who actually contributed to the most dangerous parts in both nations. Equating their role and losses to a role player is flat out wrong
-
World's Finest
Re: World War 3
Guess the USA could use another World War MVP award
-
877-954-1893
Re: World War 3
Who were the MVPS of the last few major American wars???
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|