Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 22 of 22
  1. #16
    sahelanthropus fpliii's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    9,665

    Default Re: Replace 2011 Rose with 2011 Wade

    Quote Originally Posted by The_Yearning
    You must be confusing with 2009 Wade.

    2011 Wade put up numbers but dude was awful.
    He was the same player in 09, 10, 11 really. Just had to share a ball with LeBron in his final year.

  2. #17
    A humble prophet Dresta's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Medina
    Posts
    9,829

    Default Re: Replace 2011 Rose with 2011 Wade

    Wade was inconsistent in 11 partially because he was adjusting to playing with Bron and not being the teams primary ballhandler. That Chicago team was stacked and a defensive juggernaut and would have allowed Wade to maintain his role as primary playmaker/scorer - something he did better than Rose. I can't see how the team would not be better with Wade than with Rose.

    Think how good defensively a lineup of Hinrich/Wade/Deng/Gibson/Noah or Asik would have been.

  3. #18
    Local High School Star Basketbolero's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    1,564

    Default Re: Replace 2011 Rose with 2011 Wade

    Quote Originally Posted by Dresta
    Wade was inconsistent in 11 partially because he was adjusting to playing with Bron and not being the teams primary ballhandler. That Chicago team was stacked and a defensive juggernaut and would have allowed Wade to maintain his role as primary playmaker/scorer - something he did better than Rose. I can't see how the team would not be better with Wade than with Rose.

    Think how good defensively a lineup of Hinrich/Wade/Deng/Gibson/Noah or Asik would have been.
    Hinrich wasn't there though. If we just switched Rose and Wade the Bulls starting PG would be CJ Watson, not a pretty sight.

  4. #19
    Austin Reaves Fam red1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    GOAT james
    Posts
    27,497

    Default Re: Replace 2011 Rose with 2011 Wade

    Quote Originally Posted by STATUTORY
    2011 wade was inconsistent as hell, there were stretches of regular season where he was struggling bad. chicago would been a low seeded playoff team with Wade, probably gets bounced by hawks
    no

  5. #20
    Austin Reaves Fam red1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    GOAT james
    Posts
    27,497

    Default Re: Replace 2011 Rose with 2011 Wade

    they would have been a much better team. especially in the playoffs

  6. #21
    Decent college freshman Mass Debator's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    2,792

    Default Re: Replace 2011 Rose with 2011 Wade

    No one on the Heat could've stopped Wade. Mike Miller? Eddie House? Bibby? Rose? Imagine Lebron trying to guard Wade's nasty pick in roll game getting picked all over the place. Tiring.

    Bulls defense would be better and more explosive as well. Wade and Rose's point skills are interchangeable. They would've had a greater chance at winning it all with Wade than Rose.

  7. #22
    #Trump4Treason nathanjizzle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    14,705

    Default Re: Replace 2011 Rose with 2011 Wade

    NOPE. people here claiming that the 11' team would win more games with wade than rose are delusional. bulls were first place team in the league that team, and somehow wade is suppose to carry that team beyond that?

    i agree the bulls would have done better in the playoffs, because rose just was inefficient in round 1 and 2, and just sucked in the ecf.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •