Roy Hibbert hasn't always been such a poop rebounder. What happened?

[navy]

Why?

Because it exponentializes statistics that arent meant per minute consistent. If you play 1 minute a game and scores 2 points, per 36 you score 72. Extreme example I know, but get's my point across.

[Dro]

Why?

Because it doesn't suit his Roy hating agenda...

Anyway, glad some posters already explained the same common sense I've been explaining...But when people make up their minds that they don't like a certain player, there's nothing you can say to change their minds...

[Artillery]

He's never been a great rebounder. 14.4% Career total rebound percentage. Best ever season was 2012 with 16.6%. Mediocre for a big man.

Compare that to Dwight - 20.7% career total rebound percentage. Best ever season is 2010 with 22%.

How about Tyson Chandler? 18.4% career total rebound percentage. Best ever season was 2007 with 20.7%.

[SexSymbol]

It's what happens when you have a vertical that's shorter than the average d*ck size

You don't even need to jump to be a good individual rebounder.
It's all about positioning and boxing out

[PizzamanIRL]

There is weaker defense in the league so his team mates and the other team's players are scoring more so therefore there are less rebounds to grab.

I speak only the truth.

[IMObjective]

He's letting team chemistry problems affect his game. We're picking on hibbert, but isn't everyone in the team underperforming? He's not like a shaq or Kareem that will always be great no matter what, but I still think he has the capabilities to be one of the most impactful centers in the league. There's just some nasty locker room stuff going on over there that's throwing everyone's game off, and they better start shaping up, like right now. I can't watch another Miami championship.

I feel like the pacers collapse started happening when the strange Paul George stories and pictures started popping up on the internet. It's all PG's fault!

[chips93]

Because it exponentializes statistics that arent meant per minute consistent. If you play 1 minute a game and scores 2 points, per 36 you score 72. Extreme example I know, but get's my point across.

bolded isnt a word



obviously using per 36 over small sample sizes is foolish, but when its over the course of a season, its fine, as far as im concerned

[navy]

bolded isnt a word



obviously using per 36 over small sample sizes is foolish, but when its over the course of a season, its fine, as far as im concerned

Its not. Never has been. Roy cant even play 36 minutes with his asthma.