Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 46
  1. #16
    4 ring - 4 FMVP - 4MVP J Shuttlesworth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    San Diego
    Posts
    13,733

    Default Re: Is it safe to say that Cleveland's THIRD best player is better than Chicago's FIRST?

    Quote Originally Posted by secund2nun
    yes he is. Noah is better than Rose as well.
    If we're talking about prime Rose, he's probably on par with KD as 2a and 2b in the league. If we're talking about current rose, which OP clearly is, then Ibaka and half of OKC's role players are > Rose.

  2. #17
    NBA Legend and Hall of Famer Fudge's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    LA
    Posts
    22,731

    Default Re: Is it safe to say that Cleveland's THIRD best player is better than Chicago's FIRST?

    Of course.

    Main reason why the Cavs are the favorites and the Bulls aren't.

  3. #18
    Kobe= 1st round loser secund2nun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    2,267

    Default Re: Is it safe to say that Cleveland's THIRD best player is better than Chicago's FIRST?

    Quote Originally Posted by J Shuttlesworth
    If we're talking about prime Rose, he's probably on par with KD as 2a and 2b in the league. If we're talking about current rose, which OP clearly is, then Ibaka and half of OKC's role players are > Rose.
    prime rose was very overrated.. Not even top ten in the NBA . Chicago won that year because they were the best rebounding and defensive team in the NBA, not because the mediocre offense... And rose had nothing to do with the defense and rebounding.

  4. #19
    4 ring - 4 FMVP - 4MVP J Shuttlesworth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    San Diego
    Posts
    13,733

    Default Re: Is it safe to say that Cleveland's THIRD best player is better than Chicago's FIRST?

    Quote Originally Posted by secund2nun
    prime rose was very overrated.. Not even top ten in the NBA . Chicago won that year because they were the best rebounding and defensive team in the NBA, not because the mediocre offense... And rose had nothing to do with the defense and rebounding.
    I'm not disagreeing, but prime Rose >>>>> Irving

  5. #20
    Top 1 Bball Mind.
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    12,540

    Default Re: Is it safe to say that Cleveland's THIRD best player is better than Chicago's FIRST?

    Tough to say until he plays an NBA game but he's probably still better than than Irving

  6. #21
    Embiid > Jokic SouBeachTalents's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    27,282

    Default Re: Is it safe to say that Cleveland's THIRD best player is better than Chicago's FIRST?

    Quote Originally Posted by livingby3's
    Thunder with two top tiered players, Heat with their big threes, these five players are all better than the best player the Spurs had, and look who won.
    You could seriously argue Duncan is still a better player than Bosh is

  7. #22
    NBA Superstar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    12,760

    Default Re: Is it safe to say that Cleveland's THIRD best player is better than Chicago's FIRST?

    Quote Originally Posted by SouBeachTalents
    You could seriously argue Duncan is still a better player than Bosh is
    Tough to say. Duncan hasn't been playing in an offense where he's asked to do nothing other than spot up for long 2's and 3's

  8. #23
    Bulls | Bears | W. Sox ballinhun8's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Ehhhh, BANDWAGON BOSTON
    Posts
    4,910

    Default Re: Is it safe to say that Cleveland's THIRD best player is better than Chicago's FIRST?

    LeBron and Noah are the two best players the last two years out of both rosters.

  9. #24
    YAY AREAAA!! Inferno's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    6,949

    Default Re: Is it safe to say that Cleveland's THIRD best player is better than Chicago's FIRST?

    No excuses for OKC

  10. #25
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    1,334

    Default Re: Is it safe to say that Cleveland's THIRD best player is better than Chicago's FIRST?

    Quote Originally Posted by russwest0
    Tough to say. Duncan hasn't been playing in an offense where he's asked to do nothing other than spot up for long 2's and 3's
    Did they also tell bosh not to rebound and block shots. Bosh even admitted he won't post up anymore

  11. #26
    The Wizard ralph_i_el's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Born Under a Bad Sign
    Posts
    10,937

    Default Re: Is it safe to say that Cleveland's THIRD best player is better than Chicago's FIRST?

    Noah is as valuable as Love imo. Way more impact than Irving.

  12. #27
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    San Antonio
    Posts
    4,367

    Default Re: Is it safe to say that Cleveland's THIRD best player is better than Chicago's FIRST?

    Yes it's safe to say Lebron is better than Joakim Noah

  13. #28
    Dunking on everybody in the park
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Brazil
    Posts
    657

    Default Re: Is it safe to say that Cleveland's THIRD best player is better than Chicago's FIRST?

    No, pau is way better than kyrie.

  14. #29
    Big Booty Hoes!! NumberSix's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    The Internets
    Posts
    27,096

    Default Re: Is it safe to say that Cleveland's THIRD best player is better than Chicago's FIRST?

    Who's Chicago's best player?

  15. #30
    big time kobe stan JT123's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Kobeville
    Posts
    6,993

    Default Re: Is it safe to say that Cleveland's THIRD best player is better than Chicago's FIRST?

    Quote Originally Posted by Frozen1
    No, pau is way better than kyrie.
    I would put Pau above Love as well. As Michael Jordan would say, 2 rings beats 0 rings every time.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •