Reports say Obama plans on bombing Syria.

[Draz]

obomba!!

I see what you did there

[KevinNYC]

The sheeple go along with the CIA/MIC war. Nothing Obama can do to stop it. Fake ISIS. Fake beheadings. Manufactured outrage....

What can we do....more Treasury raping BS wars....nothing will every change....

What's MIC?

Fake ISIS? Can you explain?

[Patrick Chewing]

The sheeple go along with the CIA/MIC war. Nothing Obama can do to stop it. Fake ISIS. Fake beheadings. Manufactured outrage....

What can we do....more Treasury raping BS wars....nothing will every change....

What medications are you on??

[MadeFromDust]

There's one thing good about the dimwit in chief...there's nothing more dangerous to the enemy than a non-military peace-nik once he decides to target them lmao

[Nick Young]

[QUOTE=Baller1986]They can just use drones. US won't lose in any war ever again. Have you seen some of their newer weapons?? They are capable of wiping ISIS in less than 2 weeks.

http://www.wired.com/2014/09/armys-n...y-even-in-fog/

[B][U]Army

[MavsSuperFan]

dont think bombing alone will be effective in terms of stopping ISIS, most likely it will make isis stronger (sunnis will be more attracted to ISIS as they feel the west is against sunni islam), but I totally support killing them. The more ISIS fighters that die in iraq and syria the less that can come home to the west and do damage in the west.

[Nanners]

thinking that dropping bombs will solve the problems posed by ISIS is like thinking that throwing rocks can solve the problem posed by a hornets nest.

[Lebron23]

dont think bombing alone will be effective in terms of stopping ISIS, most likely it will make isis stronger (sunnis will be more attracted to ISIS as they feel the west is against sunni islam), but I totally support killing them. The more ISIS fighters that die in iraq and syria the less that can come home to the west and do damage in the west.

I really feel bad for the innocent civilians of these countries. They deserve much better government, and better standard of living.

[MavsSuperFan]

dropping bombs and thinking it will solve the problems posed by ISIS is like thinking that throwing rocks can solve the problem posed by a hornets nest.

ISIS is an unsolvable problem.

2 solutions:
1. we all convert to sunni Islam and live by the their interpretation of the Koran
2. we use nukes to commit mass genocide.

option 1 is unacceptable

option 2 is grossly immoral and thus unacceptable.

Thousands of citizens of western nations have flocked to ISIS to fight for sunni islam. The more we kill the lower the chances they come home and do terrorist attacks here.

The desire of radical islamists to spread their religion via the blade of a sword is almost a 1000 years old

[Lebron23]

F*cking laser cannons

Let's use ISIS to test out this thing and the railgun.

We are the Galactic Empire

And they still have plenty of modern weaponry.

[RidonKs]

thinking that dropping bombs will solve the problems posed by ISIS is like thinking that throwing rocks can solve the problem posed by a hornets nest.

haha

[kNIOKAS]

The Syrian War is a multi party civil war. It's not simply 2 sides. It's much more complex than you make it out to be. Even among the parties, there have been shifting alliances and coalitions. Two days ago most of the leadership of one faction that was about to switch sides were killed in an explosion, probably betrayed by someone in their group.

But to your point, you're incorrect, we didn't give anything to ISIS.

There are people saying that West was supporting Sirian rebel groups that later broke out and became ISIS. The funding came from the Gulf states, and US and British agencies were in between this.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7FdnMJyiiwg
From transcript:

U.S. special forces and British special forces had been operating in Syria long before the kind of major, major civil unrest that kind of really broke out, and they had been operating in kind of supporting these groups. And it was very clearly stated by these officers at the time <...> that they quite explicitly said that this is about destabilizing the Assad regime from within. They had even explored the possibility of airstrikes on targets. But the favored policy was using these groups as a proxy force to destabilize Assad's regime.

<...>it's kind of ironic that we have the very same people now calling for boots on the ground, calling for a response, are the same people that have been very loud in their support for arming some of the most virulent of elements of these rebel groups. And even though the Obama administration, for instance, has given a lot of lip service, saying that we only want to fund, you know, the kind of moderate rebels and so on and so forth--but the Obama administration has actively coordinated the financing that has come from the Gulf states to the very types of groups that they historically have always favored, which is the most virulent jihadist al-Qaeda affiliated organizations. So there is a contradiction here in what we're being told now and the way in which policymakers have kind of created this crisis and now not taken responsibility for this crisis.