Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 20
  1. #1
    Land o' Lakes sammichoffate's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    7,107

    Default Better Title Run Following Finals Loss, 09 Lakers or '14 Spurs?

    Lakers got destroyed in 08 while the Spurs lost because of a miracle three. It's a tough one to decide

  2. #2
    NBA Legend and Hall of Famer Smoke117's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    26,742

    Default Re: Better Title Run Following Finals Loss, 09 Lakers or '14 Spurs?

    The Spurs. If Kevin Garnett never got injured, the Celtics were pretty easily going to win back to back championships in 2009. That team was better than the 2008 team with a a season of experience under their belt. They took the Magic to 7 games without KG, their best player. The Lakers basically lucked out. They would have lost to the Celtics again just like they did in 08.
    Last edited by Smoke117; 09-29-2014 at 03:11 PM.

  3. #3
    If cops pull up i am iTare's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    putting that brack in my brack
    Posts
    4,370

    Default Re: Better Title Run Following Finals Loss, 09 Lakers or '14 Spurs?

    **** LeShit, that's the only overrated piece of shitty ass player I hate.. Why?

    1. After a huge loss against the Orlando Magic in the Eastern Conference Final, he didn't shake hands to the winning team and bitch out like a crybaby and yet fans still call him "King James?" More like Queen James.

    2. A sophomore college kid dunk over LeShit James, and nike confiscated a ****ing tape of LeShit getting dunk over by a Xavier college boy.

    3. No kids should look up to LeShit as a role model.

  4. #4
    ... on a leash ArbitraryWater's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    I walk a higher path, son
    Posts
    46,642

    Default Re: Better Title Run Following Finals Loss, 09 Lakers or '14 Spurs?

    Spurs; not close

    Quote Originally Posted by Smoke117
    The Spurs. If Kevin Garnett never got injured, the Celtics were pretty easily going to win back to back championships in 2009. That team was better than the 2008 team with a a season of experience under their belt. They took the Magic to 7 games without KG, their best player.
    This gets ignored so many times..

  5. #5
    Stay Strong Droth Crown&Coke's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    You only get half a bar.......
    Posts
    4,204

    Default Re: Better Title Run Following Finals Loss, 09 Lakers or '14 Spurs?

    Good question.

    Lakers team that beat 2010 Celtics weren't the exact same team.

    Spurs were, and straight up dismantled the Heat. I'm going with them

  6. #6
    The Beast In Me T_L_P's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    7,664

    Default Re: Better Title Run Following Finals Loss, 09 Lakers or '14 Spurs?

    09 Lakers didn't really feel like vengeance. More like the team simply evolved and got better.

    2014 was a revenge title.

  7. #7
    Heat Nation Papaya Petee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Springfield, MA
    Posts
    5,176

    Default Re: Better Title Run Following Finals Loss, 09 Lakers or '14 Spurs?

    The Spurs... if not for a Garnett injury in 2008-2009 and not Perkins suspension and AWFUL officiating in game 7 the Lakers lose to the Celtics 3 straight finals.

  8. #8
    NBA All-star lilteapot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    9,106

    Default Re: Better Title Run Following Finals Loss, 09 Lakers or '14 Spurs?

    Quote Originally Posted by iTare
    **** LeShit, that's the only overrated piece of shitty ass player I hate.. Why?

    1. After a huge loss against the Orlando Magic in the Eastern Conference Final, he didn't shake hands to the winning team and bitch out like a crybaby and yet fans still call him "King James?" More like Queen James.

    2. A sophomore college kid dunk over LeShit James, and nike confiscated a ****ing tape of LeShit getting dunk over by a Xavier college boy.

    3. No kids should look up to LeShit as a role model.
    I feel like you just thought of "LeShit" and thought it was really clever and wanted to use it right away even if it was in a thread that has nothing to do with him

  9. #9
    shhhhhhh
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Downtown Hoops Dojo
    Posts
    28,486

    Default Re: Better Title Run Following Finals Loss, 09 Lakers or '14 Spurs?

    Lakers with the better finals run after the loss... won back to back after losing to the Celtics first the Magic then the rematch with the Celtics...

    If the Spurs win their first back to back title this season then we can talk about it.. until then...

  10. #10
    shhhhhhh
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Downtown Hoops Dojo
    Posts
    28,486

    Default Re: Better Title Run Following Finals Loss, 09 Lakers or '14 Spurs?

    Quote Originally Posted by Papaya Petee
    The Spurs... if not for a Garnett injury in 2008-2009 and not Perkins suspension and AWFUL officiating in game 7 the Lakers lose to the Celtics 3 straight finals.
    should would coulda.. Lakers were there in the finals waiting... not their fault the Celtics didn't show up one year. As for injuries boo hoo everyone fights injuries, not like the Lakers were 100% after 3 straight trips to the finals

    The Heat were beat up and tired after 4 straights trips to the finals... Wade is/was a shell of himself why is this not held against the Spurs?

  11. #11
    with God-given ass JimmyMcAdocious's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    7,888

    Default Re: Better Title Run Following Finals Loss, 09 Lakers or '14 Spurs?

    Quote Originally Posted by lilteapot
    I feel like you just thought of "LeShit" and thought it was really clever and wanted to use it right away even if it was in a thread that has nothing to do with him
    To be honest, I initially glossed over it and your post brought attention to it. Good job there.

    Spurs. Just for going through OKC (the team many thought was the bad matchup for them) and Miami (the team they should have beat the season before).

  12. #12
    70p game: DBook-1 MJ-0 livingby3's's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    3,128

    Default Re: Better Title Run Following Finals Loss, 09 Lakers or '14 Spurs?

    Quote Originally Posted by Crown&Coke
    Good question.

    Lakers team that beat 2010 Celtics weren't the exact same team.

    Spurs were, and straight up dismantled the Heat. I'm going with them
    Yeah this. Spurs came back confident and totally whooped the Heat.

  13. #13
    Bran Fam Member ImKobe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Staples Center
    Posts
    26,522

    Default Re: Better Title Run Following Finals Loss, 09 Lakers or '14 Spurs?

    09 Lakers won because we got Bynum back and Ariza became a rotation player and completely went off, we were twice as good as the 08 team.

    We would have owned Boston in the Finals that year because Ariza would have been killing them all series. Lakers also won both games against Boston in the regular season.

  14. #14
    College superstar r15mohd's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    4,908

    Default Re: Better Title Run Following Finals Loss, 09 Lakers or '14 Spurs?

    '14 Spurs for sure...I'd put it at a toss-up between the '09 Lakers and '12 Heat.

  15. #15
    ... on a leash ArbitraryWater's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    I walk a higher path, son
    Posts
    46,642

    Default Re: Better Title Run Following Finals Loss, 09 Lakers or '14 Spurs?

    Quote Originally Posted by gts
    Lakers with the better finals run after the loss... won back to back after losing to the Celtics first the Magic then the rematch with the Celtics...

    If the Spurs win their first back to back title this season then we can talk about it.. until then...
    This is a question about 2009 and 2014, their RUN after the loss... Can you read?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •