Real reason that Lakers are losing is not because of Lin but Kobe..

[AirFederer]

Lol.

[oarabbus]

First sentence, it's quite clear you have no idea what you're talking about. You're out of your depth.

@ you trying to be clever and cherry-picking while embarrassing yourself with wrong information about pop and silly generalizations. Good job.

Andgar set himself up as a person who has a greater understanding of the game BECAUSE he played basketball. His experience as a player has jackshit significance And, yeah, if you're going to use "Some of you don't even play basketball" as a leading statement, it would be nice if your resume contained something more notable than your career on the blacktop. Playing Internationally, at the collegiate or NBA level? Definitely more of a unique perspective.

I'm not even going to bother with your stuff about Stern and Silver. It's just awful.

Popovich never played professionally which is what I was referring to. Anyway then back to the acutal point, one player taking 30-40 shots while missing considerably more than half doesn't effect that player's teammates? But Lin scoring 18 on 4 -8, is the reason the Lakers lost. Clearly you are some kind of basketball savant, so educate the rest of us peons as to how that works.

[TheBigVeto]

Everyone except Kobe stans already know this

[oarabbus]

Lin Was And Will Allways Be The Marginal Scrub Stephen a Smith Called Out Years ago Bro.

Wow how are marginal scrubs singlehandedly winning games?

lol you guys have such simplistic views of basketball.

"lin is good for 16 points on 10 shots! he had 18 points on 8 shots yesterday! jeez kobe pass the ball!"

watch the games y'all see how they do when kobe's off the floor

Me: 'Lin can give you 16 points on 10 shots'
Actual result: 21 points on 12 shots

Lin: +17, 8-12 shooting, 1TO
Kobe: +7, 7-20 shooting, 4TO

Stupid Lin almost losing the game for the Lakers only shooting 75% why does kobe even let him play