Originally Posted by
ballup
Is there a point to me arguing this? Even everyone in the Serial subreddit claims Undisclosed is heavily biased. How you can't see the blatant evidence is baffling. Let's say Adnan was not convicted of the murder in the first place and Serial still made an extremely popular podcast about the mystery. You still think Rabia and Co would make Undisclosed?
Being impartial requires you to take on all sides and consider their possibility of being true. Not just dissect and bash them like what happens in Undisclosed.