#stacked # noexcuses
Results 16 to 21 of 21
-
03-05-2015, 08:04 PM #16Form is temporary
- Join Date
- Jul 2012
- Posts
- 2,152
Re: 96 Bulls role players vs 15 Thunder role players
-
03-05-2015, 08:07 PM #17Form is temporary
- Join Date
- Jul 2012
- Posts
- 2,152
Re: 96 Bulls role players vs 15 Thunder role players
We have a new entry to the dumbest things we've heard on ISH.
Originally Posted by Cowboy Thunder
-
03-05-2015, 08:08 PM #18dude, where's my shaq?
- Join Date
- Apr 2013
- Posts
- 5,213
Re: 96 Bulls role players vs 15 Thunder role players
Waiters will find a way to chuck the Thunder out of the game.
-
03-05-2015, 09:51 PM #19NBA Superstar
- Join Date
- Sep 2006
- Posts
- 14,877
Re: 96 Bulls role players vs 15 Thunder role players
The Bulls without Jordan and Pippen are probably a 500 team. Id say theyd be capable of winning 42 games. The Thunder without Westbrook and Durant? Probaly 30 games.
The Bulls are better.
-
03-05-2015, 11:26 PM #20I get superstar calls
- Join Date
- Aug 2010
- Posts
- 3,969
Re: 96 Bulls role players vs 15 Thunder role players
I think he meant 6th man Kukoc = then 6th man Harden in terms of impact. There's zero reason to ever compare Harden to Kukoc straight up. Originally Posted by deja vu
-
03-05-2015, 11:28 PM #21I get superstar calls
- Join Date
- Aug 2010
- Posts
- 3,969
Re: 96 Bulls role players vs 15 Thunder role players
Lamb is better than any of those Thunder guards except maybe Augustine. How he magically just lost all his minutes is beyond me. Is he sleeping with Scott Brook's daughter or something? Originally Posted by Mass Debator
Reply With Quote
