A better electoral Map

[FillJackson]

NY Times is trying out an electoral map where the size of the state is determined by their electoral votes/population and not by they geographic size.

I think this approach makes a lot sense. Alaska is enormous, but it doesn't really matter much in elections, because it doesn't have very many electoral votes. Texas is giant too, but it has many more electoral votes, so it matters more, so it's bigger.


It also indicates that both Maine and Nebraska award their electoral votes at the congressional district level, not the state level. This comes into play if we ever have a super close election or a tie.

[Nick Young]

The latest polls from this morning have Trump at 47% and Clinton at 40% by the way.

Also, Trump is currently up +3 in Ohio, I don't know where you got that map from.


Under budget and ahead of schedule.

[FillJackson]

I like this because you still get a sense of Midwest, South, Northeast, and you see the value of each state towards 270.

[Nick Young]

Berned out by Bernie's betrayal?

Now is as good a time as any to learn about[COLOR="Green"] the Queen of Thorns[/COLOR], the Based Dr. Jill Stein of House Green








Trust her. She's a Doctor.
House DNC is hemorrhaging voters.
[COLOR="Green"]Follow the Queen of Thorns.[/COLOR]

[Hawker]

You mean kinda like 538 has been doing on its election forecast?

Am I supposed to be impressed by the NY Times doing this? It's not some innovative thing in terms of visual representation of data.

[Patrick Chewing]

[FillJackson]

You mean kinda like 538 has been doing on its election forecast?

I much prefer the boxes to 538's honeycombs. It's very hard to read 538's map.

[Nanners]

get real, kevin you prefer the ny times map because it makes it look like hillary is still leading.

its "very hard to read" anything that suggests trump has taken the lead

[Nick Young]

+3 in Ohio
AND TRUMP HASN'T EVEN STARTED ON OHIO YET

Landslide victory folks.

We are on pace for the first 50 state sweep in US election history



UNDER BUDGET AND AHEAD OF SCHEDULE

[TheMan]

Nick's troll posts will be hilarious on Nov 8

[Nick Young]

False bravado and hiding your head in the sand won't stop reality.

Nick's troll posts will be hilarious on Nov 8

Have you heard of the #DNCwalkout and #DemExit?

Maybe not, the mainstream media is refusing to cover it.

CNN believes "Clinton nomination puts 'biggest crack' in glass ceiling" is an accurate summarization of DNC: http://archive.is/CiJUT


Sarah silverman "Thank God they can fix this in post": https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gensWq4xl0I

Hundreds walk out, empty stadium: https://twitter.com/sci_solar/status/758116370840039424

Other speakers: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cnhGMUKeq1A

[Hawker]

get real, kevin you prefer the ny times map because it makes it look like hillary is still leading.

its "very hard to read" anything that suggests trump has taken the lead

He talks like a retard in his OP.

"Alaska is enormous but doesn't matter much because it doesn't have many electoral votes."

No f[COLOR="Black"]u[/COLOR]cking shit. Everyone on ISH knows this.

[falc39]

get real, kevin you prefer the ny times map because it makes it look like hillary is still leading.

its "very hard to read" anything that suggests trump has taken the lead

It's hillarious how bad he is at trying to hide his shilling. Dude tries so hard to craft his posts objectively but everyone can see the agenda he is pushing.

[9erempiree]

NY Times is trying out an electoral map where the size of the state is determined by their electoral votes/population and not by they geographic size.

I think this approach makes a lot sense. Alaska is enormous, but it doesn't really matter much in elections, because it doesn't have very many electoral votes. Texas is giant too, but it has many more electoral votes, so it matters more, so it's bigger.


It also indicates that both Maine and Nebraska award their electoral votes at the congressional district level, not the state level. This comes into play if we ever have a super close election or a tie.

We already know this.

The NYTimes is dumbing down the electoral map for guys like you.

[DeuceWallaces]

get real, kevin you prefer the ny times map because it makes it look like hillary is still leading.

its "very hard to read" anything that suggests trump has taken the lead

If you find this very hard to read, you may want to see a physician or mental health specialist.