-
ISH vigilant
Re: Only 4 Teams in NBA History That Won More Than 64 Games..
Originally Posted by eliteballer
Go do the math yourself then, or are too st00pid?
You calling anyone stupid is just ironic as it comes
-
... on a leash
Re: Only 4 Teams in NBA History That Won More Than 64 Games..
Some context in difference to how those teams were built:
1973 Celtics (team effort)
2007 Mavericks (one man carrying job)
2009 Cavaliers (one man carrying job)
2016 Spurs (team effort)
2016 Warriors (team effort)
mediocre role players flaming out in the post-season but shining in the regular season, with less pressure and during a hot streak, is more understandable than the Spurs/Warriors losses.
But, Thunder have always had it out for the Spurs... and meanwhile the Warriors faced the co. GOAT doing heroic stuff
-
Embiid > Jokic
Re: Only 4 Teams in NBA History That Won More Than 64 Games..
Originally Posted by ArbitraryWater
Some context in difference to how those teams were built:
1973 Celtics (team effort)
2007 Mavericks (one man carrying job)
2009 Cavaliers (one man carrying job)
2016 Spurs (team effort)
2016 Warriors (team effort)
mediocre role players flaming out in the post-season but shining in the regular season, with less pressure and during a hot streak, is more understandable than the Spurs/Warriors losses.
But, Thunder have always had it out for the Spurs... and meanwhile the Warriors faced the co. GOAT doing heroic stuff
Agreed, but the circumstances of LeBron losing in '09 & Dirk in '07 couldn't have been more different
-
Let's Talks Numbers
Re: Only 4 Teams in NBA History That Won More Than 64 Games..
2007 Cavs- Leader was a man child with no moves, jumper and a turnover machine
2016 Warriors - Leader was an actual child and a turnover machine.
Spurs- Tough match up that any team in the league would've loss to.
-
... on a leash
Re: Only 4 Teams in NBA History That Won More Than 64 Games..
Originally Posted by SouBeachTalents
Agreed, but the circumstances of LeBron losing in '09 & Dirk in '07 couldn't have been more different
in '07 it had alot to do with the coach/mismatch factor, and Dirk's father being in the middle of surgery, too..
how crazy is it for a 67-win team to have a negative season series against another team over 4 games, one team of the other 29, and exactly that one team, they have to face in the first round... and its coached by your former coach... lol.
-
All For *One* For All
Re: Only 4 Teams in NBA History That Won More Than 64 Games..
OP f[COLOR="Black"]u[/COLOR]cked this thread up right from the beginning.
-
7-time NBA All-Star
Re: Only 4 Teams in NBA History That Won More Than 64 Games..
Originally Posted by warriorfan
16 Warriors were the only team who had their best player suffer a major knee injury during the playoffs
Seriously, just shut the f**k up. Your bullshit ran it's course a long time ago. Curry was well enough to play. It wasn't a "torn meniscus" like you keep saying, it was a sprained MCL. A grade one sprain at that; the most minor of sprains.
Saying it was a major knee injury is just more bullshit, agenda driven hyperbole. A major knee injury would've meant he was carted, carried, or wheel-charied off the court and missed a significant amount of time. "Major knee injury" would imply that he was too injured to return until possibly next season and would've needed pretty immediate surgery to fix his knee.
If a guy is well enough to be running around and playing without a noticeable limp, then it's not a "major knee injury."
-
LeMassiveunderdog
Re: Only 4 Teams in NBA History That Won More Than 64 Games..
Originally Posted by warriorfan
16 Warriors were the only team who had their best player suffer a major knee injury during the playoffs
Paul pierce outplayed prime Kobe with a sprained knee in 08. It was worse than curry's injury.
-
College superstar
Re: Only 4 Teams in NBA History That Won More Than 64 Games..
And almost lost to the same team. Before a historic choke.
-
NBA Legend and Hall of Famer
Re: Only 4 Teams in NBA History That Won More Than 64 Games..
Originally Posted by KG215
Seriously, just shut the f**k up. Your bullshit ran it's course a long time ago. Curry was well enough to play. It wasn't a "torn meniscus" like you keep saying, it was a sprained MCL. A grade one sprain at that; the most minor of sprains.
Saying it was a major knee injury is just more bullshit, agenda driven hyperbole. A major knee injury would've meant he was carted, carried, or wheel-charied off the court and missed a significant amount of time. "Major knee injury" would imply that he was too injured to return until possibly next season and would've needed pretty immediate surgery to fix his knee.
If a guy is well enough to be running around and playing without a noticeable limp, then it's not a "major knee injury."
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|