Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 23
  1. #1
    Facts Are Misleading
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    A Court Near You
    Posts
    6,513

    Default Romo doesn't have the voice to be lead analyst.

    He was awful.

  2. #2
    NBA Legend
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Kansas City
    Posts
    15,366

    Default Re: Romo doesn't have the voice to be lead analyst.

    I thought he was darn good, for the bits and pieces I saw. At the very least he had some good insight on the type of reads quarterbacks should be making.

  3. #3
    454 Dumper
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    the underground
    Posts
    6,647

    Default Re: Romo doesn't have the voice to be lead analyst.




    Great minds think alike.

    I poasted the same thing yesterday


    As guru said...


    https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=GD8hhNtxPgs

  4. #4
    NBA Legend
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Indianapolis
    Posts
    18,146

    Default Re: Romo doesn't have the voice to be lead analyst.

    I thought he did a great job.

    He's extremely intelligent, regarding football.

  5. #5
    The One
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    CT, GOATLAND
    Posts
    19,948

    Default Re: Romo doesn't have the voice to be lead analyst.

    I liked that he was calling play before it happened

  6. #6
    pronouns - he/haw
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    oregon
    Posts
    10,899

    Default Re: Romo doesn't have the voice to be lead analyst.

    he was about 1000x better than phil simms, but thats not saying much...

  7. #7
    NBA Legend and Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    25,502

    Default Re: Romo doesn't have the voice to be lead analyst.

    Quote Originally Posted by CelticBaller
    I liked that he was calling play before it happened
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eRDxDEhEgNY

  8. #8
    Decent playground baller
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Back up off the FUT
    Posts
    84

    Default Re: Romo doesn't have the voice to be lead analyst.

    Not fair to judge based off those clips instead of a whole game, but...pretty good? His voice is rough I guess but from a color commentator I just want content. Simms had a better voice but he struggled to construct a coherent sentence, much less give you insight on the game.

    I used to hate Collinsworth and how smarmy he was but I've done a 180 on him, he's easily been the best guy the last couple of years.

  9. #9
    One of One
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    D[M]V
    Posts
    7,505

    Default Re: Romo doesn't have the voice to be lead analyst.

    Quote Originally Posted by Nanners
    he was about 1000x better than phil simms, but thats not saying much...

    Not many people in or around the NFL I dislike as much as Dolt Simms.

    Maybe Jerry Jones, John Mara, Terrell Suggs, Chip Kelly.

  10. #10
    pronouns - he/haw
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    oregon
    Posts
    10,899

    Default Re: Romo doesn't have the voice to be lead analyst.

    after 4 games its safe to say romo is my favorite commentator by far. i dont understand complaints about his voice, i love that he doesnt have one of those cheesey "sports announcer" voices, he just sounds like a normal guy who is excited about football. he is so in tune with everything happening on the field, seems like he can see every play before it happens. cbs should bring back mike carey and have him make bets with romo live on the air.

    another great thing is that romo has brought jim nantz out of his deep depression by rescuing him from phil simms, and now the cbs nfl broadcasts have gone from being the worst to the best.

    does anybody really miss this shit?
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bGvsWD29WSE
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Qh9hjtTgyY
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mUCh00WHRqY
    Last edited by Nanners; 09-29-2017 at 03:22 AM.

  11. #11
    Facts Are Misleading
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    A Court Near You
    Posts
    6,513

    Default Re: Romo doesn't have the voice to be lead analyst.

    I don't need a guy to tell me what play is coming or who's gonna do what before it even happens.

    He's taking the suspense out of it because he's always right. And he does it quite often.

    Stick him on the 3rd CBS crew. I don't like him doing all the high profile games.

  12. #12
    The One
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    CT, GOATLAND
    Posts
    19,948

    Default Re: Romo doesn't have the voice to be lead analyst.

    Quote Originally Posted by Carbine
    I don't need a guy to tell me what play is coming or who's gonna do what before it even happens.

    He's taking the suspense out of it because he's always right. And he does it quite often.

    Stick him on the 3rd CBS crew. I don't like him doing all the high profile games.
    You

  13. #13
    NBA Legend
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Indianapolis
    Posts
    18,146

    Default Re: Romo doesn't have the voice to be lead analyst.

    I thought he was outstanding last night.

    His little tidbits about what a QB is looking at pre-snap are great. At halftime, he literally said 'the Bears need to come out in 3 wide sets', and the entire second half opening drive, the Bears were in three wide sets.

  14. #14
    Decent playground baller
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Back up off the FUT
    Posts
    84

    Default Re: Romo doesn't have the voice to be lead analyst.

    Hating on him is completely ridiculous but who would expect any less from carbine.

    Pretty much every other color announcer has nothing to offer all game but banal platitudes like "boy, what a football player he is"

  15. #15
    ~the original p.tiddy~
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    ~dallas,texas~ team: ~cowboys~
    Posts
    17,478

    Default Re: Romo doesn't have the voice to be lead analyst.


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •