-
The One
Re: new Michael Jackson documentary sends fans into the arms of healthcare professionals
Originally Posted by scuzzy
I never followed the MJ accusations much back in the 90's, but I remember there being A LOT of shaming him for it.
Didn't the accusers parents years later come out and say they made the shit up all to score $$$?
The kids pointed out the birthmarks on his dick iirc
-
The One
Re: new Michael Jackson documentary sends fans into the arms of healthcare professionals
You have to be in extreme denial to believe MJ didn
-
NBA lottery pick
Re: new Michael Jackson documentary sends fans into the arms of healthcare professionals
Originally Posted by Kblaze8855
When I read about it it struck me as a child porn stash looked over by a lawyer who removed the parts he couldn’t defend in court. He had nude pics of kids that were technically legal because it was old medical pictures and shit.
Kinda thing only a person attracted to kids would keep....but you can’t call porn technically.
Even today it's not considered porn. I sort of get why, it's difficult to pinpoint exactly when an illustration of a child goes from a newborn/toddler, which ppl don't have a problem with, to an adolescent child which is considered taboo. Plus I guess there's also reason if you have some historical context. From what I understand there has to be some semblance of sexuality going on to be considered child porn. But the editors and authors of these books were fully aware of this and walked this tightrope so they could peddle their books to pedophiles. They did regularly cross the line though. The editors and authors of the books of naked children found in MJ's home were convicted pedophiles and had been convicted for selling child pornography.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|