The Cavs had three perennial allstars in 2016 in their prime...

[Hey Yo]

if they have 3 HOF's, then yes, they're a super-team, regardless of whether they underachieve with 58 wins or not.

And again, only the Cavs and Warriors had 3 HOF's in recent years (super-teams), while the Heat were the only super-team from 11-14'.. And lebron's teams always had record payroll..

so lebron should be knocked for not having dominant favorites or flirting with 70 wins like curry/kawhi did, and instead losing more with consistent underdog status.. but Lebron fans have simply weaponized his losing by seeking sympathy for his underdog status, instead of knocking him for not winning and achieving favorites like his peers

Ok, it's my turn to try that.

If a team has 4 All-stars, then they are a superteam.

LeBron w/o Love and only Kyrie for 2gms swept the 2015 Hawks superteam.

[Hey Yo]

You sure about that...





LeBron has beaten 4 superteams in his career whilst MJ has beaten 0

You forgot the 60 win 4 All-Star Hawks team. I made the rule that, if they have 4 All-stars, then they're a superteam.

[Manny98]

You forgot the 60 win 4 All-Star Hawks team. I made the rule that, if they have 4 All-stars, then they're a superteam.

So LeBron has beaten 5 superteams to MJs 0

[3ball]

.
2012 Celtics

Garnett 35, Pierce 34, Allen 36


2013 Spurs

Duncan 36, Ginobili 35, Parker 30


1991 Pistons

Isiah 29, Dumars 27, Rodman 27



And lebron had his own 3-4 HOF teams from 2011-2017, so it's normal competition for him to face similar teams (super-team era), whereas MJ won his first 3 rings with less help (2 HOF team) and his era had superior parity/competitive balance/real, natural competitive environment

[jbryan1984]

How about those 2014 Spurs with 1 AS in Tony Parker beating Miami's 3 AS's in their prime.... in 5 games no less.

[superduper]

Those mentioning the Hawks need to take ESL before even dreaming of knowing what perennial means.