Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234
Results 46 to 47 of 47

Thread: Kevin Garnett ordered to pay $100,000 a month in child/spousal support

  1. #46
    The Wizard ralph_i_el's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Born Under a Bad Sign
    Posts
    9,823

    Default Re: Kevin Garnett ordered to pay $100,000 a month in child/spousal support

    He could just raise his own kids and this wouldn't be a problem.

  2. #47
    The Wizard ralph_i_el's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Born Under a Bad Sign
    Posts
    9,823

    Default Re: Kevin Garnett ordered to pay $100,000 a month in child/spousal support

    Quote Originally Posted by Gunslinger
    This excuse doesn't work.

    My mom worked hard every day while my dad didn't work when I was a kid. What is stopping these women from working, too? And my mom did not have a successful career where she moved up a ladder, getting promotions or anything. Just standard labor jobs that didn't require a diploma. Why can't these women do the same?

    You don't get money for opportunity loss. That's nonsense. And if so, why do only women receive it? And not just any woman, but only some women? Plenty of men suffer from opportunity loss and don't receive anything and plenty of women as well. What about all of them? Just because you happened to choose to open your legs for a professional athlete, only those women get awarded $$$ for opportunity loss, but not anyone else?

    Your dad could have got alimony then if they split. My uncle gets alimony and support and has full custody of both his kids. His ex is an insurance exec.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •