Trump removes independent watchdog for coronavirus funds

[andgar923]

https://www.theguardian.com/world/20...ronavirus-drug

[TheMan]

You don't have a problem with him removing oversight for trillions of the taxpayer's money? You know he's going to try to get some of that cash for himself right?

Why would he? He's always been viewed as an honest businessman, it's not like he has more than a thousand lawsuits against him...oh wait.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/...tles/84995854/

[MaxFly]

For those who think this is good, what's the argument for reduced or no oversight? And why take the step to fire those providing oversight?

[Phong]

For those who think this is good, what's the argument for reduced or no oversight? And why take the step to fire those providing oversight?

They only change is that he replaced inspector general Glenn Fine with inspector general Sean W. O'Donnell. The Pandemic Response Accountability Committee is still there.

How is the oversight reduced or completely removed? Do you know the professional record of both these men to conclude that?

[Stephonit]

https://www.theguardian.com/world/20...ronavirus-drug

If you or a loved one fall seriously ill with covid-19, what are you going to do? Decline using hydroxychloroquine out of spite?

The media is being seriously irresponsible in its coverage.

[tpols]

If you or a loved one fall seriously ill with covid-19, what are you going to do? Decline using hydroxychloroquine out of spite?

The media is being seriously irresponsible in its coverage.

if trump came out and said water was good for you, OP would die of dehydration.

[Long Duck Dong]

If you or a loved one fall seriously ill with covid-19, what are you going to do? Decline using hydroxychloroquine out of spite?

The media is being seriously irresponsible in its coverage.

You know libtards done gone too far when other libtards are going out of their way to point out what a big libtard they are

From ultra liberal Vox

This would suggest that the president — and anyone else who bought this particular Dodge & Cox product — may not profit very much from increased hydroxychloroquine sales, and that any benefits drug companies in the portfolio see may not be enough to offset the loses of other included companies.

Trump’s financial disclosures don’t show exactly how much each trust has invested in the fund, but they do say it is $15,000 or less. Financial Times reporter Kadhim Shubber wrote this means the president’s stake in Sanofi is likely worth about $450.

So here's the libtard narrative, aka people like andgar923. Trump is pushing a dangerous drug on the American populace so he can collect a few hundred dollars.

Gives away his 400k salary every year but he's going kill people to get that $450 stock up to $1000.

[Phong]

You know libtards done gone too far when other libtards are going out of their way to point out what a big libtard they are

From ultra liberal Vox



So here's the libtard narrative, aka people like andgar923. Trump is pushing a dangerous drug on the American populace so he can collect a few hundred dollars.

Gives away his 400k salary every year but he's going kill people to get that $450 stock up to $1000.

[Hawker]

You know libtards done gone too far when other libtards are going out of their way to point out what a big libtard they are

From ultra liberal Vox



So here's the libtard narrative, aka people like andgar923. Trump is pushing a dangerous drug on the American populace so he can collect a few hundred dollars.

Gives away his 400k salary every year but he's going kill people to get that $450 stock up to $1000.

$450 is a lot to andgar

[Hawker]

How is it determined that these generals are actually independent and non-partisan?