-
NBA lottery pick
This the year lakers overtake celtics in total rings?
Big season for the franchise...
Random fact, there are only 11 franchises with more than one ring.
Teams |
Finals' appearances |
Championships |
Years won |
Boston Celtics |
21 |
17 |
1957, 1959, 1960, 1961, 1962, 1963, 1964, 1965, 1966, 1968, 1969, 1974, 1976, 1981, 1984, 1986, 2008 |
Minneapolis/Los Angeles Lakers |
32 |
17 |
1949, 1950, 1952, 1953, 1954, 1972, 1980, 1982, 1985, 1987, 1988, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2009, 2010, 2020 |
Chicago Bulls |
6 |
6 |
1991, 1992, 1993, 1996, 1997, 1998 |
Philadelphia/San Francisco/Golden State Warriors |
10 |
6 |
1947, 1956, 1975, 2015, 2017, 2018 |
San Antonio Spurs |
6 |
5 |
1999, 2003, 2005, 2007, 2014 |
Syracuse Nationals/Philadelphia 76ers |
9 |
3 |
1955, 1967, 1983 |
Fort Wayne/Detroit Pistons |
7 |
3 |
1989, 1990, 2004 |
Miami Heat |
5 |
3 |
2006, 2012, 2013 |
Houston Rockets |
4 |
2 |
1994, 1995 |
New York Knicks |
8 |
2 |
1970, 1973 |
Milwaukee Bucks |
3 |
2 |
1971, 2021 |
source: https://ca.nba.com/news/nba-finals-m...0NBA%20history..
-
Re: This the year lakers overtake celtics in total rings?
Its crazy that all of the spurs rings are with duncan, miami’s are with wade and the bulls’ are with jordan. The only two rockets rings are with hakeem.
-
Professor Objectivity
Re: This the year lakers overtake celtics in total rings?
Only 8 teams have won 3 and more championships.
22 other teams really thirsting out there.
-
2nd Greatest Player
Re: This the year lakers overtake celtics in total rings?
Yes. Lakers are more motivated
-
Roid
Re: This the year lakers overtake celtics in total rings?
Lakers fielded a championship team every calendar decade except the 60s (in which they still made the finals many times)
-
Embiid > Jokic
Re: This the year lakers overtake celtics in total rings?
Originally Posted by bison
Lakers fielded a championship team every calendar decade except the 60s (in which they still made the finals many times)
They didn't win once in the 90's, made just one Final too
-
The Bearded Menace
Re: This the year lakers overtake celtics in total rings?
Copied/pasted from wikipedia ;)
-
Please clap.
Re: This the year lakers overtake celtics in total rings?
I think and hope that they are too old and James and Westbrook are a poor fit. They have a ton of on paper talent but James is better off with a shooter.
-
Cancer
-
Roid
Re: This the year lakers overtake celtics in total rings?
Originally Posted by SouBeachTalents
They didn't win once in the 90's, made just one Final too
They won the title in 2000 as part of a season that started in 1999. So technically a laker champion team was active in the 90s. It’s a stretch but that’s what I meant to convey when I said ‘calendar decade’. Also Staples opened in 99, official consecrating that three peat dynasty in 1999
-
NBA lottery pick
Re: This the year lakers overtake celtics in total rings?
So where is the mecca of basketball?
-
NBA rookie of the year
Re: This the year lakers overtake celtics in total rings?
The Lakers are definitely a better franchise.
Boston is only that high on the list because they happened to draft 1 particular guy... Bill Russell.
They'd be really good compared to the rest of the league but not in this conversation of top franchise... without said 1 guy.
The Lakers you can take away any 1 guy and they still have a ton of rings. Not true of the Celtics. The Celtics haven't been truly relevant for 30+ years/since Larry Bird. Yeah, they had a couple of goes at the title with Garnett but that was short lived.
-
NBA rookie of the year
Re: This the year lakers overtake celtics in total rings?
Oh but wait... I forgot... ISH and online brain dead logic would dictate that the Celtics have a way way way more impressive history.
After all, the Lakers are only 17 of 32 while the Celtics are 17 of 21.
Damn Lakers ****ing up their legacy by losing in the Finals.
-
9x All Defensive 1st
Re: This the year lakers overtake celtics in total rings?
Originally Posted by Shogon
Oh but wait... I forgot... ISH and online brain dead logic would dictate that the Celtics have a way way way more impressive history.
After all, the Lakers are only 17 of 32 while the Celtics are 17 of 21.
Damn Lakers ****ing up their legacy by losing in the Finals.
baaaanng!!!
-
Re: This the year lakers overtake celtics in total rings?
They should rank it based on finals appearance then and not on rings won if that is the new criteria nowadays
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|