Democrats currently stealing another election

[KennyPowers]

Republican was winning by 28,000 votes and democrat judge reinstated rejected ballots to give democrat 13 vote win.


I'm not going to be shocked in the slightest when people start opening fire on the swamp creatures.

[Axe]

A brilliant conspiracy theory to say the least

[Gruppenführer]

The mind of a Democrat. Accuse your opponent of cheating when it's you who is the one that is cheating.

[Mr. Woke]

The Republicans are the ones attempting a coup.

They are a disgrace and hate America.

[Nanners]

[CelticBaller]

OP is a walking cliche

[Overdrive]

Another day. Another full blown meltdown.

[diamenz]

that's malarky. here's the deal...

...

...

i lost my train of thought.

[Nanners]

that's malarky. here's the deal...

...

...

i lost my train of thought.

cmon man... we chroose truth over facts

[Jasper]

I have a question for y'all -

If the Republicans call the Democrats communists

What are the Republicans ???

[Axe]

I have a question for y'all -

If the Republicans call the Democrats communists

What are the Republicans ???

Dictators i believe

[3ba11]

.

The tight races in the trio of states had a big electoral impact. As NPR's Domenico Montanaro has put it, "just 44,000 votes in Georgia, Arizona and Wisconsin separated Biden and Trump from a tie in the Electoral College."

Of course, Trump is no stranger to narrow victories. He won the 2016 election thanks to just under 80,000 combined votes in three of those six key states.

https://www.npr.org/2020/12/02/94068...the-presidency

CONCLUSION: since both elections in 16' or 20' could've been swung with small, targeted efforts of ballot-stuffing in 3 states (just a few thousand votes in 3 states), everyone has been fooled into this narrative that "widespread voter fraud" was needed to steal the 2016 or 2020 election..

150 million votes cast and only 44,000 needed to be fraudulent, aka widespread fraud not needed to steal election..

Btw, the 2016 election reminded us that the election can be won by simply upsetting the opponent in a couple states - this set the stage for 2020 where Dems knew that widespread fraud wasn't needed - just a couple states and a few thousand ballots stuffed in those states..

But surely there's nothing to see here - I'm sure the elections are completely safe because everyone knows there was no motive to steal the election (everyone loved Trump) and there was no historical precedent that would show the capacity for fraud (no Russian collusion hoax.. no illegal spying.. nothing like that)

[Axe]

.

The tight races in the trio of states had a big electoral impact. As NPR's Domenico Montanaro has put it, "just 44,000 votes in Georgia, Arizona and Wisconsin separated Biden and Trump from a tie in the Electoral College."

Of course, Trump is no stranger to narrow victories. He won the 2016 election thanks to just under 80,000 combined votes in three of those six key states.

https://www.npr.org/2020/12/02/94068...the-presidency

CONCLUSION: since both elections in 16' or 20' could've been swung with small, targeted efforts of ballot-stuffing in 3 states (just a few thousand votes in 3 states), everyone has been fooled into this narrative that "widespread voter fraud" was needed to steal the 2016 or 2020 election..

150 million votes cast and only 44,000 needed to be fraudulent, aka widespread fraud not needed to steal election..

Btw, the 2016 election reminded us that the election can be won by simply upsetting the opponent in a couple states - this set the stage for 2020 where Dems knew that widespread fraud wasn't needed - just a couple states and a few thousand ballots stuffed in those states..

But surely there's nothing to see here - I'm sure the elections are completely safe because everyone knows there was no motive to steal the election (everyone loved Trump) and there was no historical precedent that would show the capacity for fraud (no Russian collusion hoax.. no illegal spying.. nothing like that)

1-9