Reggie basically beat the 98' Bulls, so how would he lose to Bulls w/out MJ in 94'?

[Phoenix]

Who's having pizza this weekend?

[tpols]

Are we talking about the 94 Bulls beating the 94 Pacers? Or the 98 Pacers?

Or the 98 Bulls without Jordan against the 98 Pacers?

I’m so confused.

I think the point is...

R Miller vs. 90' Pistons..... 20.7 on 57%... 17.9 usage
Pippen. vs. 90' Pistons..... 16.6 on 43%... 20.4 usage

R Miller vs 93' Knicks....... 31.5 on 53%... 27.5 usage
Pippen. vs 93' Knicks....... 22.5 on 51%... 28.4 usage

R Miller vs 94' Knicks....... 24.7 on 44%... 30.1 usage
Pippen. vs 94' Knicks....... 21.7 on 41%... 31.7 usage

R Miller vs 95' Magic........ 25.9 on 52%... 26.2 usage
Pippen. vs 95' Magic........ 19.0 on 42%... 23.1 usage

R Miller vs 00' Lakers....... 24.3 on 41%... 25.0 usage
Pippen. vs 00' Lakers....... 15.1 on 43%... 19.5 usage
Pippen. vs 99' Lakers....... 18.3 on 33%... 23.5 usage

R Miller 98' ECF............... 17.4 on 41%... 21.1 usage
Pippen. 98' ECF............... 16.6 on 39%... 26.0 usage

Against common playoff opponents, Reggie Miller destroys Pippen in his performances and production. And he did it as the 1st option, with no MJ to distract the defense... just Rik Smits. So if Reggie played with Jordan it would have been even more of a wrap. Like some Curry Durant type tandem.

[ShawkFactory]

I think the point is...



Against common playoff opponents, Reggie Miller destroys Pippen in his performances and production. And he did it as the 1st option, with no MJ to distract the defense... just Rik Smits. So if Reggie played with Jordan it would have been even more of a wrap. Like some Curry Durant type tandem.

But that’s not what he said..

And that’s not what the thread title says

I know his ultimate “point” is that Pippen sucked. Trust me, that is not missed..

[tpols]

But that’s not what he said..

And that’s not what the thread title says

I know his ultimate “point” is that Pippen sucked. Trust me, that is not missed..

I mean.... the title is pretty clear. Why couldn't Reggie and the Pacers beat the the '94 Knicks if the '98 Pacers were a hair away from beating them with MJ?

Nevermind that the Bulls were a shot away from a potential 0-3 hole and sweep vs the Knicks. Pippens 1st option caliber is just far below Reggies for their career.

And I don't see Reggie being worse if he gets to be 2nd option to the GOAT and gets even easier looks.

[ShawkFactory]

I mean.... the title is pretty clear. Why couldn't Reggie and the Pacers beat the the '94 Knicks if the '98 Pacers were a hair away from beating them with MJ?

Nevermind that the Bulls were a shot away from a potential 0-3 hole and sweep vs the Knicks. Pippens 1st option caliber is just far below Reggies for their career.

And I don't see Reggie being worse if he gets to be 2nd option to the GOAT and gets even easier looks.

Yes, I understand what the title says. I’ll refer you back to my first post then..

94 and 98 are different years. By a decent amount.

[3ba11]

I think the point is...



Against common playoff opponents, Reggie Miller destroys Pippen in his performances and production. And he did it as the 1st option, with no MJ to distract the defense... just Rik Smits. So if Reggie played with Jordan it would have been even more of a wrap. Like some Curry Durant type tandem.

That's fire